Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36011011›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

DWI Metrics Differentiating Benign Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms from Invasive Pancreatic Cancer: A Study in GEM Models.

Miguel Romanello Joaquim, Emma E Furth, Yong Fan, Hee Kwon Song, Stephen Pickup, Jianbo Cao, Hoon Choi, Mamta Gupta, Quy Cao, Russell Shinohara and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miguel Romanello JoaquimDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4219-1880
Emma E FurthPancreatic Cancer Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Yong FanDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Hee Kwon SongDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Stephen PickupDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Jianbo CaoDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0859-1680
Hoon ChoiDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Mamta GuptaDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0928-1104
Quy CaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6204-1305
Russell ShinoharaDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Deirdre McMenaminDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Cynthia ClendeninPancreatic Cancer Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Thomas B KarasicPancreatic Cancer Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Jeffrey DudaDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5031-5735
James C GeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Peter J O'DwyerPancreatic Cancer Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Mark A RosenDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Rong ZhouDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4018-381X
University of Pennsylvania · USCancer Research Center · US

Funding

Penn Quantitative MRI Resource for Pancreatic CancerU24CA231858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ODWYER, PETER J, ROSEN, MARK ALAN · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
NIH HHS 1U24CA231858-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

KPC (KrasG12D:Trp53R172H:Pdx1-Cre) and CKS (KrasG12D:Smad4L/L:Ptf1a-Cre) mice are genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models that capture features of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), respectively. We compared these autochthonous tumors using quantitative imaging metrics from diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI in reference to quantitative histological metrics including cell density, fibrosis, and microvasculature density. Our results revealed distinct DW-MRI metrics between the KPC vs. CKS model (mimicking human PDAC vs. IPMN lesion): the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of CKS tumors is significantly higher than that of KPC, with little overlap (mean ± SD 2.24±0.2 vs. 1.66±0.2, p<10−10) despite intratumor and intertumor variability. Kurtosis index (KI) is also distinctively separated in the two models. DW imaging metrics are consistent with growth pattern, cell density, and the cystic nature of the CKS tumors. Coregistration of ex vivo ADC maps with H&E-stained sections allowed for regional comparison and showed a correlation between local cell density and ADC value. In conclusion, studies in GEM models demonstrate the potential utility of diffusion-weighted MRI metrics for distinguishing pancreatic cancer from benign pancreatic cysts such as IPMN.

Indexed as

diffusion-weighted MRIdynamic contrast-enhanced MRIgenetically engineered mouse modelintraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmsneoplastic progressionpancreatic adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID36011011
PMCPMC9406679
OpenAlexW4292547241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.