Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010865›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Circulating Cells with Macrophage-like Characteristics in Cancer: The Importance of Circulating Neoplastic-Immune Hybrid Cells in Cancer.

Thomas L Sutton, Ranish K Patel, Ashley N Anderson, Stephen G Bowden, Riley Whalen, Nicole R Giske, Melissa H Wong

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The authors respond to feedback onFrontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Implications of Heterotypic Cell Fusion in Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas L SuttonDepartment of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2894-7154
Ranish K PatelDepartment of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3672-5735
Ashley N AndersonDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Stephen G BowdenDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6320-210X
Riley WhalenDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Nicole R GiskeDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5190-5174
Melissa H WongDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5127-279X
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Understanding the origins of rapid recurrence of pancreatic cancer after resectionP30CA069533 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Luiz Eduardo Bertassoni · 1997 to 2026
$60.5M
Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute TL1 ProgramTL1TR002371 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ALLISON Deborah FRYER, JESSINA C MCGREGOR · 2017 to 2026
$6.2M
Transplanted Stem Cells and Tumor ProgressionR01CA118235 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, MELISSA H. · 2006 to 2010
$1.4M
Novel mechanisms of cancer metastasisR21CA172334 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, MELISSA H. · 2013 to 2014
$363k
Mechanisms of Neoplastic Hybrid Cell Dissemination in Colorectal CancerF31CA271676 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, ASHLEY NICOLE · 2022 to 2025
$168k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002371NCI NIH HHS F31 CA271676NIH HHS CA069533NIH HHS CA118235NIH HHS CA172334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer remains a significant cause of mortality in developed countries, due in part to difficulties in early detection, understanding disease biology, and assessing treatment response. If effectively harnessed, circulating biomarkers promise to fulfill these needs through non-invasive "liquid" biopsy. While tumors disseminate genetic material and cellular debris into circulation, identifying clinically relevant information from these analytes has proven difficult. In contrast, cell-based circulating biomarkers have multiple advantages, including a source for tumor DNA and protein, and as a cellular reflection of the evolving tumor. While circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have dominated the circulating cell biomarker field, their clinical utility beyond that of prognostication has remained elusive, due to their rarity. Recently, two novel populations of circulating tumor-immune hybrid cells in cancer have been characterized: cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) and circulating hybrid cells (CHCs). CAMLs are macrophage-like cells containing phagocytosed tumor material, while CHCs can result from cell fusion between cancer and immune cells and play a role in the metastatic cascade. Both are detected in higher numbers than CTCs in peripheral blood and demonstrate utility in prognostication and assessing treatment response. Additionally, both cell populations are heterogeneous in their genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic signatures, and thus have the potential to inform on heterogeneity within tumors. Herein, we review the advances in this exciting field.

Indexed as

CAMLCHCCTCfusionfusion hybridliquid biopsymacrophage-tumor fusion

Identifiers

PMID36010865
PMCPMC9405966
OpenAlexW4290999270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.