Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010844›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Multimodal Prediction of Five-Year Breast Cancer Recurrence in Women Who Receive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Simona Rabinovici-Cohen, Xosé M Fernández, Beatriz Grandal Rejo, Efrat Hexter, Oliver Hijano Cubelos, Juha Pajula, Harri Pölönen, Fabien Reyal, Michal Rosen-Zvi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Deep learning in multi-modal breast cancer data fusion: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Review
  5. The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Immunohistochemical predictors of local recurrence in breast carcinoma: development and sensitivity validation of an IHC-based risk score.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Simona Rabinovici-CohenIBM Research-Israel, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498825, Israel.
Xosé M FernándezInstitut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7139-6215
Beatriz Grandal RejoInstitut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
Efrat HexterIBM Research-Israel, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498825, Israel.
Oliver Hijano CubelosInstitut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
Juha PajulaVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Kivimiehentie 3, 02150 Espoo, Finland.
Harri PölönenVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Kivimiehentie 3, 02150 Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3270-2897
Fabien ReyalInstitut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
Michal Rosen-ZviIBM Research-Israel, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498825, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-9724
Institut Curie · FRCarmel (Israel) · ILVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland · FIHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program 780495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In current clinical practice, it is difficult to predict whether a patient receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer is likely to encounter recurrence after treatment and have the cancer recur locally in the breast or in other areas of the body. We explore the use of clinical history, immunohistochemical markers, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (DCE, ADC, Dixon) to predict the risk of post-treatment recurrence within five years. We performed a retrospective study on a cohort of 1738 patients from Institut Curie and analyzed the data using classical machine learning, image processing, and deep learning. Our results demonstrate the ability to predict recurrence prior to NAC treatment initiation using each modality alone, and the possible improvement achieved by combining the modalities. When evaluated on holdout data, the multimodal model achieved an AUC of 0.75 (CI: 0.70, 0.80) and 0.57 specificity at 0.90 sensitivity. We then stratified the data based on known prognostic biomarkers. We found that our models can provide accurate recurrence predictions (AUC > 0.89) for specific groups of women under 50 years old with poor prognoses. A version of our method won second place at the BMMR2 Challenge, with a very small margin from being first, and was a standout from the other challenge entries.

Indexed as

breast cancer recurrencedeep learningimage processingmachine learningmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)neoadjuvant chemotherapyradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36010844
PMCPMC9405765
OpenAlexW4293516297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.