Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010742›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Information Theoretic Methods for Variable Selection-A Review.

Jan Mielniczuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jan MielniczukInstitute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jana Kazimierza 5, 01-248 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2621-2303

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review the principal information theoretic tools and their use for feature selection, with the main emphasis on classification problems with discrete features. Since it is known that empirical versions of conditional mutual information perform poorly for high-dimensional problems, we focus on various ways of constructing its counterparts and the properties and limitations of such methods. We present a unified way of constructing such measures based on truncation, or truncation and weighing, for the Möbius expansion of conditional mutual information. We also discuss the main approaches to feature selection which apply the introduced measures of conditional dependence, together with the ways of assessing the quality of the obtained vector of predictors. This involves discussion of recent results on asymptotic distributions of empirical counterparts of criteria, as well as advances in resampling.

Indexed as

conditional independencefeature selectioninteraction informationMarkov blanketMöbius expansion

Identifiers

PMID36010742
PMCPMC9407310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.