Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010465›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Sorghum Flour Application in Bread: Technological Challenges and Opportunities.

Pervin Ari Akin, Ilkem Demirkesen, Scott R Bean, Fadi Aramouni, Ismail Hakkı Boyaci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pervin Ari AkinField Crops Central Research Institute, Ankara 06170, Turkey.
Ilkem DemirkesenDepartment of Animal Health, Food and Feed Research, General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Scott R BeanCenter for Grain and Animal Health Research, USDA-ARS, 1515 College Ave., Manhattan, KS 66502, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8678-8094
Fadi AramouniCenter for Grain and Animal Health Research, USDA-ARS, 1515 College Ave., Manhattan, KS 66502, USA.
Ismail Hakkı BoyaciDepartment of Food Engineering, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, Ankara 06800, Turkey.

Funding

United States Department of Agriculture CRIS Project 3020-3440-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sorghum has a long history of use in the production of different types of bread. This review paper discusses different types of bread and factors that affect the physicochemical, technological, rheological, sensorial, and nutritional properties of different types of sorghum bread. The main types of bread are unleavened (roti and tortilla), flatbread with a pre-ferment (injera and kisra), gluten-free and sorghum bread with wheat. The quality of sorghum flour, dough, and bread can be improved by the addition of different ingredients and using novel and traditional methods. Furthermore, extrusion, high-pressure treatment, heat treatment, and ozonation, in combination with techniques such as fermentation, have been reported for increasing sorghum functionality.

Indexed as

breadflatbreadgluten-freepan breadsorghumtortilla

Identifiers

PMID36010465
PMCPMC9407531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.