ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Spectroscopic Data for the Rapid Assessment of Microbiological Quality of Chicken Burgers.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Nondestructive Measurement Technologies for Meat Quality and Safety: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Spatial Ingredient Classification in Plant-Based Food.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025Article
- Occurrence, Antibiotic Resistance and Biofilm-Forming Ability ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Enhancing Shelf Life Prediction of Fresh Pizza with Regression Models and Low Cost Sensors.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid assessment of the microbiological quality of highly perishable food commodities is of great importance. Spectroscopic data coupled with machine learning methods have been investigated intensively in recent years, because of their rapid, non-destructive, eco-friendly qualities and their potential to be used on-, in- or at-line. In the present study, the microbiological quality of chicken burgers was evaluated using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and multispectral imaging (MSI) in tandem with machine learning algorithms. Six independent batches were purchased from a food industry and stored at 0, 4, and 8 °C. At regular time intervals (specifically every 24 h), duplicate samples were subjected to microbiological analysis, FTIR measurements, and MSI sampling. The samples (n = 274) acquired during the data collection were classified into three microbiological quality groups: “satisfactory”: 4−7 log CFU/g, “acceptable”: 7−8 log CFU/g, and “unacceptable”: >8 logCFU/g. Subsequently, classification models were trained and tested (external validation) with several machine learning approaches, namely partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and ordinal logistic regression (OLR). Accuracy scores were attained for the external validation, exhibiting FTIR data values in the range of 79.41−89.71%, and, for the MSI data, in the range of 74.63−85.07%. The performance of the models showed merit in terms of the microbiological quality assessment of chicken burgers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.