Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010374›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Postmortem Bacteriology in Forensic Autopsies-A Single Center Retrospective Study in Romania.

Iuliana Diac, Arthur-Atilla Keresztesi, Anda-Mihaela Cerghizan, Mihai Negrea, Cătălin Dogăroiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iuliana DiacMina Minovici National Institute of Legal Medicine, 042122 Bucharest, Romania.
Arthur-Atilla Keresztesi"Fogolyan Kristof" Emergency County Hospital Sfantu Gheorghe, Covasna County Institution of Forensic Medicine, 520045 Covasna, Romania.
Anda-Mihaela CerghizanMedical Clinic, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, 540043 Mures, Romania.
Mihai NegreaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Science, "Babeș Bolyai" University, 400084 Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Cătălin DogăroiuMina Minovici National Institute of Legal Medicine, 042122 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postmortem bacteriology examinations have been a controversial topic over the years, though the value of postmortem bacteriology cultures remains promising. The aim of this study was to review the postmortem bacteriological sampling procedures and results in a single centre in Bucharest over a period of 10 years. Material and methods: The present study was a retrospective, single-center study, performed at the Mina Minovici National Institute of Legal Medicine in Bucharest, Romania, from 2011-2020. Results: Postmortem bacteriology was requested 630 forensic autopsies, 245 female (38.9%) and 385 male (61.1%), age range 0 and 94 years, median age of 52 years. Deaths occurred in hospital for 594 cases (94.3%) and out-of-hospital for 36 cases (5.7%-field case). Blood cultures were requested in the majority of cases, followed by tracheal swabs and lung tissue. In-hospital and out of hospital deaths did not differ significantly regarding the number of microorganisms identified in a positive blood culture. Postmortem bacteriology cultures of the respiratory tract showed a statistically significant association to microscopically confirmed lung infections. Conclusions Postmortem sampling for bacteriology testing in our center in Bucharest is heterogeneous with a high variation of patterns. A positive blood culture result for

Indexed as

medico-legal autopsypostmortem bacteriologysampling patterns

Identifiers

PMID36010374
PMCPMC9407211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.