Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010346›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Detection and Characterization of Gastric Cancer Using Cascade Deep Learning Model in Endoscopic Images.

Atsushi Teramoto, Tomoyuki Shibata, Hyuga Yamada, Yoshiki Hirooka, Kuniaki Saito, Hiroshi Fujita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. [Research progress on endoscopic image diagnosis of gastric tumors based on deep learning].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Atsushi TeramotoSchool of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7613-5348
Tomoyuki ShibataDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan.
Hyuga YamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan.
Yoshiki HirookaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9639-7425
Kuniaki SaitoSchool of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan.
Hiroshi FujitaFaculty of Engineering, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2936-9296
Fujita Health University · JPGifu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopy is widely applied in the examination of gastric cancer. However, extensive knowledge and experience are required, owing to the need to examine the lesion while manipulating the endoscope. Various diagnostic support techniques have been reported for this examination. In our previous study, segmentation of invasive areas of gastric cancer was performed directly from endoscopic images and the detection sensitivity per case was 0.98. This method has challenges of false positives and computational costs because segmentation was applied to all healthy images that were captured during the examination. In this study, we propose a cascaded deep learning model to perform categorization of endoscopic images and identification of the invasive region to solve the above challenges. Endoscopic images are first classified as normal, showing early gastric cancer and showing advanced gastric cancer using a convolutional neural network. Segmentation on the extent of gastric cancer invasion is performed for the images classified as showing cancer using two separate U-Net models. In an experiment, 1208 endoscopic images collected from healthy subjects, 533 images collected from patients with early stage gastric cancer, and 637 images from patients with advanced gastric cancer were used for evaluation. The sensitivity and specificity of the proposed approach in the detection of gastric cancer via image classification were 97.0% and 99.4%, respectively. Furthermore, both detection sensitivity and specificity reached 100% in a case-based evaluation. The extent of invasion was also identified at an acceptable level, suggesting that the proposed method may be considered useful for the classification of endoscopic images and identification of the extent of cancer invasion.

Indexed as

classificationconvolutional neural networkdeep learninggastric cancersegmentation

Identifiers

PMID36010346
PMCPMC9406996
OpenAlexW4293678621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.