Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010325›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Detection Using Horizontal and Vertical Patch Division-Based Pre-Trained DenseNET with Digital Fundus Images.

Sabiha Gungor Kobat, Nursena Baygin, Elif Yusufoglu, Mehmet Baygin, Prabal Datta Barua, Sengul Dogan, Orhan Yaman, Ulku Celiker, Hakan Yildirim, Ru-San Tan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Sabiha Gungor KobatDepartment of Ophthalmology, Firat University Hospital, Firat University, Elazig 23119, Turkey.
Nursena BayginDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kafkas University, Kars 36000, Turkey.
Elif YusufogluDepartment of Ophthalmology, Elazig Fethi Sekin City Hospital, Elazig 23280, Turkey.
Mehmet BayginDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ardahan University, Ardahan 75000, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5258-754X
Prabal Datta BaruaSchool of Management & Enterprise, University of Southern Queensland, Darling Heights, QLD 4350, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5117-8333
Sengul DoganDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, Technology Faculty, Firat University, Elazig 23119, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9677-5684
Orhan YamanDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, Technology Faculty, Firat University, Elazig 23119, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9623-2284
Ulku CelikerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Firat University Hospital, Firat University, Elazig 23119, Turkey.
Hakan YildirimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Firat University Hospital, Firat University, Elazig 23119, Turkey.
Ru-San TanDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore 169609, Singapore.
Turker TuncerDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, Technology Faculty, Firat University, Elazig 23119, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5126-6445
Nazrul IslamGlaucoma Faculty, Bangladesh Eye Hospital & Institute, Dhaka 1209, Bangladesh.
U Rajendra AcharyaNgee Ann Polytechnic, Department of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Singapore 599489, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2689-8552
Fırat University · TRArdahan University · TRAsia University · TWDuke-NUS Medical School · SGElazığ Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRKafkas University · TRUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common complication of diabetes that can lead to progressive vision loss. Regular surveillance with fundal photography, early diagnosis, and prompt intervention are paramount to reducing the incidence of DR-induced vision loss. However, manual interpretation of fundal photographs is subject to human error. In this study, a new method based on horizontal and vertical patch division was proposed for the automated classification of DR images on fundal photographs. The novel sides of this study are given as follows. We proposed a new non-fixed-size patch division model to obtain high classification results and collected a new fundus image dataset. Moreover, two datasets are used to test the model: a newly collected three-class (normal, non-proliferative DR, and proliferative DR) dataset comprising 2355 DR images and the established open-access five-class Asia Pacific Tele-Ophthalmology Society (APTOS) 2019 dataset comprising 3662 images. Two analysis scenarios, Case 1 and Case 2, with three (normal, non-proliferative DR, and proliferative DR) and five classes (normal, mild DR, moderate DR, severe DR, and proliferative DR), respectively, were derived from the APTOS 2019 dataset. These datasets and these cases have been used to demonstrate the general classification performance of our proposal. By applying transfer learning, the last fully connected and global average pooling layers of the DenseNet201 architecture were used to extract deep features from input DR images and each of the eight subdivided horizontal and vertical patches. The most discriminative features are then selected using neighborhood component analysis. These were fed as input to a standard shallow cubic support vector machine for classification. Our new DR dataset obtained 94.06% and 91.55% accuracy values for three-class classification with 80:20 hold-out validation and 10-fold cross-validation, respectively. As can be seen from steps of the proposed model, a new patch-based deep-feature engineering model has been proposed. The proposed deep-feature engineering model is a cognitive model, since it uses efficient methods in each phase. Similar excellent results were seen for three-class classification with the Case 1 dataset. In addition, the model attained 87.43% and 84.90% five-class classification accuracy rates using 80:20 hold-out validation and 10-fold cross-validation, respectively, on the Case 2 dataset, which outperformed prior DR classification studies based on the five-class APTOS 2019 dataset. Our model attained about >2% classification results compared to others. These findings demonstrate the accuracy and robustness of the proposed model for classification of DR images.

Indexed as

deep feature extractiondiabetic retinopathyneighborhood component analysispatch divisionsupport vector machinetransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID36010325
PMCPMC9406859
OpenAlexW4291744147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.