Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010318›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Emulating Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning for Jaw Cysts with Machine Learning.

Balazs Feher, Ulrike Kuchler, Falk Schwendicke, Lisa Schneider, Jose Eduardo Cejudo Grano de Oro, Tong Xi, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Tzu-Ming Harry Hsu, Janet Brinz, Akhilanand Chaurasia and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

Balazs FeherDepartment of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4386-6237
Ulrike KuchlerDepartment of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9744-9856
Falk SchwendickeDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health, and Health Services Research, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1223-1669
Lisa SchneiderDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health, and Health Services Research, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
Jose Eduardo Cejudo Grano de OroDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health, and Health Services Research, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
Tong XiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9142-9253
Shankeeth VinayahalingamDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2679-3841
Tzu-Ming Harry HsuComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7198-7832
Janet BrinzDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Akhilanand ChaurasiaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226003, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8356-9512
Kunaal DhingraPeriodontics Division, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4318-480X
Robert Andre GaudinDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9061-7220
Hossein Mohammad-RahimiDentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416634793, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4971-5926
Nielsen PereiraPrivate Practice in Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Rio de Janeiro 22430-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9265-2724
Francesc Perez-PastorServei Salut Dental, Gerencia Atencio Primaria, Institut Balear de la Salut, 07003 Palma, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3735-4465
Olga TryfonosDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Biochemistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5145-6812
Sergio E UribeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Oral Health, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-0684-2025
Marcel HanischDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Clinic Münster, 48143 Münster, Germany.
Joachim KroisDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health, and Health Services Research, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6010-8940
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATRadboud University Nijmegen · NLAcademic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NLAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INAustral University of Chile · CLBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKing George's Medical University · INLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USServei de Salut de les Illes Balears · ESShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection and classification of cystic lesions of the jaw is of high clinical relevance and represents a topic of interest in medical artificial intelligence research. The human clinical diagnostic reasoning process uses contextual information, including the spatial relation of the detected lesion to other anatomical structures, to establish a preliminary classification. Here, we aimed to emulate clinical diagnostic reasoning step by step by using a combined object detection and image segmentation approach on panoramic radiographs (OPGs). We used a multicenter training dataset of 855 OPGs (all positives) and an evaluation set of 384 OPGs (240 negatives). We further compared our models to an international human control group of ten dental professionals from seven countries. The object detection model achieved an average precision of 0.42 (intersection over union (IoU): 0.50, maximal detections: 100) and an average recall of 0.394 (IoU: 0.50-0.95, maximal detections: 100). The classification model achieved a sensitivity of 0.84 for odontogenic cysts and 0.56 for non-odontogenic cysts as well as a specificity of 0.59 for odontogenic cysts and 0.84 for non-odontogenic cysts (IoU: 0.30). The human control group achieved a sensitivity of 0.70 for odontogenic cysts, 0.44 for non-odontogenic cysts, and 0.56 for OPGs without cysts as well as a specificity of 0.62 for odontogenic cysts, 0.95 for non-odontogenic cysts, and 0.76 for OPGs without cysts. Taken together, our results show that a combined object detection and image segmentation approach is feasible in emulating the human clinical diagnostic reasoning process in classifying cystic lesions of the jaw.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecystsdiagnosismachine learningoralradiographysurgery

Identifiers

PMID36010318
PMCPMC9406703
OpenAlexW4291392403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.