Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010308›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

FAPI PET versus FDG PET, CT or MRI for Staging Pancreatic-, Gastric- and Cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Head-to-Head Comparisons of Diagnostic Performances.

Sophie E M Veldhuijzen van Zanten, Kay J Pieterman, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Ilanah J Pruis, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Lydi M J W van Driel, Frederik A Verburg, Maarten G J Thomeer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic Performance of Radiolabelled FAPI Versus [International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. cGMP-compliant high-yield automated production of [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation ofClinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Imaging in translational cancer research.Cancer biology & medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie E M Veldhuijzen van ZantenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3888-0977
Kay J PietermanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas P L WijnhovenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ilanah J PruisDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lydi M J W van DrielDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Frederik A VerburgDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten G J ThomeerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a pressing demand for the development of cancer-specific diagnostic imaging tools, particularly for staging of pancreatic-, gastric- or cholangiocarcinoma, as current diagnostic imaging techniques, including CT, MRI and PET using FDG, are not fully adequate. The novel PET-tracer "FAPI" has the potential to visualize even small tumour deposits employing the tumour-specific expression of fibroblast-activating protein (FAP) in malignant cells.

methodsWe performed a systematic review to select studies investigating the use of FAPI PET for staging pancreatic-, gastric- and cholangiocarcinoma (PROSPERO CRD42022329512). Patient-wise and lesion-wise comparisons were performed for primary tumour (T), lymph nodes (N), organ metastases (M) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and tumour-to-background ratios (TBR) were compared between PET using FAPI versus FDG (if reported).

resultsTen articles met the inclusion criteria. In all studies, FAPI PET showed superiority over FDG-PET/CT/MRI for the detection of T, N, M and PC, both in the patient-wise and in lesion-wise comparisons (when performed). Additionally, higher SUVmax and TBRmax values were reported for use of FAPI compared to FDG.

conclusionsThe positive results of this review warrant prospective clinical studies to investigate the accuracy and clinical value of FAPI PET for diagnosing and staging patients with pancreatic-, gastric- and cholangiocarcinoma.

Indexed as

cholangiocarcinomadiagnostic performanceFAPI PETgastric carcinomapancreatic carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID36010308
PMCPMC9406684
OpenAlexW4291392344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.