Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010273›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Big Data in Laboratory Medicine-FAIR Quality for AI?

Tobias Ueli Blatter, Harald Witte, Christos Theodoros Nakas, Alexander Benedikt Leichtle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tobias Ueli BlatterDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital-University Hospital Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0298-8177
Harald WitteDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital-University Hospital Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4421-3580
Christos Theodoros NakasDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital-University Hospital Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4155-722X
Alexander Benedikt LeichtleDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital-University Hospital Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6528-9904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory medicine is a digital science. Every large hospital produces a wealth of data each day-from simple numerical results from, e.g., sodium measurements to highly complex output of "-omics" analyses, as well as quality control results and metadata. Processing, connecting, storing, and ordering extensive parts of these individual data requires Big Data techniques. Whereas novel technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning have exciting application for the augmentation of laboratory medicine, the Big Data concept remains fundamental for any sophisticated data analysis in large databases. To make laboratory medicine data optimally usable for clinical and research purposes, they need to be FAIR: findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. This can be achieved, for example, by automated recording, connection of devices, efficient ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes, careful data governance, and modern data security solutions. Enriched with clinical data, laboratory medicine data allow a gain in pathophysiological insights, can improve patient care, or can be used to develop reference intervals for diagnostic purposes. Nevertheless, Big Data in laboratory medicine do not come without challenges: the growing number of analyses and data derived from them is a demanding task to be taken care of. Laboratory medicine experts are and will be needed to drive this development, take an active role in the ongoing digitalization, and provide guidance for their clinical colleagues engaging with the laboratory data in research.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical chemistrydigitalizationFAIRificationinteroperability

Identifiers

PMID36010273
PMCPMC9406962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.