Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010267›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparison of Multiple Radiomics Models for Identifying Histological Grade of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Preoperatively Based on Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Two-Center Study in Southwest China.

Hongfan Liao, Yongmei Li, Yaying Yang, Huan Liu, Jiao Zhang, Hongwei Liang, Gaowu Yan, Yanbing Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hongfan LiaoCollege of Medical Informatics of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Yixueyuan Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400016, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0574-6421
Yongmei LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Yaying YangDepartment of Pathology, Molecular Medicine and Cancer Research Center, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Huan LiuGE Healthcare, Shanghai 201203, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6700-962X
Jiao ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401120, China.
Hongwei LiangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Gaowu YanDepartment of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining 429000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0622-1678
Yanbing LiuCollege of Medical Informatics of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Yixueyuan Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400016, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe designed and validated the value of multiple radiomics models for diagnosing histological grade of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), holding a promise of assisting in precision medicine and providing clinical therapeutic strategies.

methods198 PDAC patients receiving surgical resection and pathological confirmation were enrolled and classified as 117 low-grade PDAC and 81 high-grade PDAC group. An external validation group was used to assess models' performance. Available radiomics features were selected using GBDT algorithm on the basis of the arterial and venous phases, respectively. Five different machine learning models were built including k-nearest neighbour, logistic regression, naive bayes model, support vector machine, and random forest using ten times tenfold cross-validation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to establish clinical model and combined model. The models' performance was assessed according to its predictive performance, calibration curves, and decision curves. A nomogram was established for visualization. Survival analysis was conducted for stratifying the overall survival prior to treatment.

resultsIn the training group, the RF model demonstrated the optimal predictive ability and robustness with an AUC of 0.943; the SVM model achieved the secondary performance, followed by Bayes model. In the external validation group, these three models (Bayes, RF, SVM) also achieved the top three predictive ability. A clinical model was built by selected clinical features with an AUC of 0.728, and combined model was established by an RF model and a clinical model with an AUC of 0.961. The log-rank test revealed that the low-grade group survived longer than the high-grade group.

conclusionsThe multiphasic CECT radiomics models offered an accurate and noninvasive perspective to differentiate histological grade in PDAC and advantages of machine learning models including RF, SVM and Bayes were more remarkable.

Indexed as

histological grademachine learningpancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaprognosisradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36010267
PMCPMC9406915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.