Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010235›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Prevalence and Characteristics of Accessory Mandibular Canals: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study in a European Adult Population.

Giuseppe Varvara, Beatrice Feragalli, Ilser Turkyilmaz, Aurelio D'Alonzo, Fabiola Rinaldi, Serena Bianchi, Maurizio Piattelli, Guido Macchiarelli, Sara Bernardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giuseppe VarvaraDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, Dental School, 'G. D'Annunzio' University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7501-0794
Beatrice FeragalliDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Dental School, 'G. D'Annunzio' University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Ilser TurkyilmazDepartment of Prosthodontics, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, USA.
Aurelio D'AlonzoDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, Dental School, 'G. D'Annunzio' University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Fabiola RinaldiDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, Dental School, 'G. D'Annunzio' University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Serena BianchiDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3731-5463
Maurizio PiattelliDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, Dental School, 'G. D'Annunzio' University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Guido MacchiarelliDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9182-0586
Sara BernardiDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6130-8533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this observational study is to evaluate the prevalence and main characteristics of bifid canals within a European adult population, analyzing cone-beam-computed tomography (CBCT). The population study examined 300 subjects. The CBCTs were performed between 2012 and 2019, using PaX-Zenith3D with a standard protocol of acquisition. The parameters analyzed were the presence and lengths of the bifid mandibular canals. The sample included 49% male and 51% female participants. The mean age of the patients was 47.07 ± 17.7 years. Anatomical variants of the mandibular canal were identified in 28.8% of the sides and 50.3% of the patients. In 7.3% of the subjects, the anatomical variants were present bilaterally. The most frequently encountered bifid canal was Type 3 (40.5%), followed by the Type 1 canal (39.3%), the Type 2 canal (14.5%), and the Type 4 canal (5.9%), 40% on the right side and 60% on the left side. The average length of the bifid canals located on the right side of the mandible was 11.96 ± 5.57 mm, compared to 11.38 ± 4.89 mm for those measured on the left side. The bifid mandibular canal is a common anatomical variation of the mandibular canal. It is fundamental to performing an accurate preoperative evaluation using CBCT analysis to avoid and/or reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Indexed as

accessory mandibular foraminabifid canalsinferior alveolar nervemandibular canal variant

Identifiers

PMID36010235
PMCPMC9406331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.