ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Accurately Identifying Cerebroarterial Stenosis from Angiography Reports Using Natural Language Processing Approaches.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic Review of Large Language Models and Natural Language Processing in Stroke Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Clinical applications of large language models in medicine and surgery: A scoping review.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with intracranial artery stenosis show high incidence of stroke. Angiography reports contain rich but underutilized information that can enable the detection of cerebrovascular diseases. This study evaluated various natural language processing (NLP) techniques to accurately identify eleven intracranial artery stenosis from angiography reports. Three NLP models, including a rule-based model, a recurrent neural network (RNN), and a contextualized language model, XLNet, were developed and evaluated by internal-external cross-validation. In this study, angiography reports from two independent medical centers (9614 for training and internal validation testing and 315 as external validation) were assessed. The internal testing results showed that XLNet had the best performance, with a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 using eleven targeted arteries. The rule-based model attained an AUROC from 0.92 to 0.96, and the RNN long short-term memory model attained an AUROC from 0.95 to 0.97. The study showed the potential application of NLP techniques such as the XLNet model for the routine and automatic screening of patients with high risk of intracranial artery stenosis using angiography reports. However, the NLP models were investigated based on relatively small sample sizes with very different report writing styles and a prevalence of stenosis case distributions, revealing challenges for model generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.