Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010224›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Classification Scheme of Heating Risk during MRI Scans on Patients with Orthopaedic Prostheses.

Valeria Clementi, Umberto Zanovello, Alessandro Arduino, Cristina Ancarani, Fabio Baruffaldi, Barbara Bordini, Mario Chiampi, Luca Zilberti, Oriano Bottauscio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valeria ClementiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2400-8448
Umberto ZanovelloIstituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Strada delle Cacce 91, 10135 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6415-9967
Alessandro ArduinoIstituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Strada delle Cacce 91, 10135 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4829-5130
Cristina AncaraniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1251-4589
Fabio BaruffaldiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8784-5652
Barbara BordiniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6606-4950
Mario ChiampiIstituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Strada delle Cacce 91, 10135 Torino, Italy.
Luca ZilbertiIstituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Strada delle Cacce 91, 10135 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2382-4710
Oriano BottauscioIstituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Strada delle Cacce 91, 10135 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5437-4396
Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica · ITIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · IT

Funding

EURAMET 17IND01 MIMAS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the large variety of possible clinical scenarios, a reliable heating-risk assessment is not straightforward when patients with arthroplasty undergo MRI scans. This paper proposes a simple procedure to estimate the thermal effects induced in patients with hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty during MRI exams. The most representative clinical scenarios were identified by a preliminary frequency analysis, based on clinical service databases, collecting MRI exams of 11,658 implant carrier patients. The thermal effects produced by radiofrequency and switching gradient fields were investigated through 588 numerical simulations performed on an ASTM-like phantom, considering four prostheses, two static field values, seven MR sequences, and seven regions of imaging. The risk assessment was inspired by standards for radiofrequency fields and by scientific studies for gradient fields. Three risk tiers were defined for the radiofrequency, in terms of whole-body and local SAR averages, and for GC fields, in terms of temperature elevation. Only 50 out of 588 scenarios require some caution to be managed. Results showed that the whole-body SAR is not a self-reliant safety parameter for patients with metallic implants. The proposed numerical procedure can be easily extended to any other scenario, including the use of detailed anatomical models.

Indexed as

gradient-induced heatingMRI heating riskMRI safetyorthopaedic implantsradiofrequency-induced heating

Identifiers

PMID36010224
PMCPMC9406867
OpenAlexW4289521935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.