ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Convolutional Neural Network Techniques for Brain Tumor Classification (from 2015 to 2022): Review, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Performance in Image-Based Cancer Identification: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of the hybrid machine learning models for brain tumour segmentation and detection in medical images.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Performance of artificial intelligence in diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- A class-wise quantum relational calibration network for brain tumor diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Federated MobileNetV2 with ensemble meta-learning for privacy-preserving brain tumor classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Clinical evaluation of two glioblastoma delineation methods based on neural networks.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Enhanced MRI brain tumor detection using deep learning in conjunction with explainable AI SHAP based diverse and multi feature analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sparse transformer and multipath decision tree: a novel approach for efficient brain tumor classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Visualization of Runs of Homozygosity and Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Biology · 2025Article
- Building Better Deep Learning Models Through Dataset Fusion: A Case Study in Skin Cancer Classification with Hyperdatasets.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advanced Brain Tumor Classification in MR Images Using Transfer Learning and Pre-Trained Deep CNN Models.Cancers · 2025Article
- Improving healthcare sustainability using advanced brain simulations using a multi-modal deep learning strategy with VGG19 and bidirectional LSTM.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Brain tumor segmentation using deep learning: high performance with minimized MRI data.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
- Brain Tumor MRI Classification Using a Novel Deep Residual and Regional CNN.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- IMPA-Net: Interpretable Multi-Part Attention Network for Trustworthy Brain Tumor Classification from MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- RETRACTED: Multi-modal deep learning methods for classification of chest diseases using different medical imaging and cough sounds.PloS one · 2024Article
- Enhancing brain tumor diagnosis: an optimized CNN hyperparameter model for improved accuracy and reliability.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Deep Learning Aided Neuroimaging and Brain Regulation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Easy-to-use machine learning system for the prediction of IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion using MRI images of adult-type diffuse gliomas.Brain tumor pathology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) constitute a widely used deep learning approach that has frequently been applied to the problem of brain tumor diagnosis. Such techniques still face some critical challenges in moving towards clinic application. The main objective of this work is to present a comprehensive review of studies using CNN architectures to classify brain tumors using MR images with the aim of identifying useful strategies for and possible impediments in the development of this technology. Relevant articles were identified using a predefined, systematic procedure. For each article, data were extracted regarding training data, target problems, the network architecture, validation methods, and the reported quantitative performance criteria. The clinical relevance of the studies was then evaluated to identify limitations by considering the merits of convolutional neural networks and the remaining challenges that need to be solved to promote the clinical application and development of CNN algorithms. Finally, possible directions for future research are discussed for researchers in the biomedical and machine learning communities. A total of 83 studies were identified and reviewed. They differed in terms of the precise classification problem targeted and the strategies used to construct and train the chosen CNN. Consequently, the reported performance varied widely, with accuracies of 91.63-100% in differentiating meningiomas, gliomas, and pituitary tumors (26 articles) and of 60.0-99.46% in distinguishing low-grade from high-grade gliomas (13 articles). The review provides a survey of the state of the art in CNN-based deep learning methods for brain tumor classification. Many networks demonstrated good performance, and it is not evident that any specific methodological choice greatly outperforms the alternatives, especially given the inconsistencies in the reporting of validation methods, performance metrics, and training data encountered. Few studies have focused on clinical usability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.