Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010200›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Convolutional Neural Network Techniques for Brain Tumor Classification (from 2015 to 2022): Review, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.

Yuting Xie, Fulvio Zaccagna, Leonardo Rundo, Claudia Testa, Raffaele Agati, Raffaele Lodi, David Neil Manners, Caterina Tonon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Clinical evaluation of two glioblastoma delineation methods based on neural networks.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Deep Learning Aided Neuroimaging and Brain Regulation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuting XieDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Fulvio ZaccagnaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6838-9532
Leonardo RundoDepartment of Information and Electrical Engineering and Applied Mathematics, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3341-5483
Claudia TestaFunctional and Molecular Neuroimaging Unit, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Raffaele AgatiProgramma Neuroradiologia con Tecniche ad elevata complessità, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Raffaele LodiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
David Neil MannersDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2404-1101
Caterina TononDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.

Funding

China Scholarship Council No. 202008320283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) constitute a widely used deep learning approach that has frequently been applied to the problem of brain tumor diagnosis. Such techniques still face some critical challenges in moving towards clinic application. The main objective of this work is to present a comprehensive review of studies using CNN architectures to classify brain tumors using MR images with the aim of identifying useful strategies for and possible impediments in the development of this technology. Relevant articles were identified using a predefined, systematic procedure. For each article, data were extracted regarding training data, target problems, the network architecture, validation methods, and the reported quantitative performance criteria. The clinical relevance of the studies was then evaluated to identify limitations by considering the merits of convolutional neural networks and the remaining challenges that need to be solved to promote the clinical application and development of CNN algorithms. Finally, possible directions for future research are discussed for researchers in the biomedical and machine learning communities. A total of 83 studies were identified and reviewed. They differed in terms of the precise classification problem targeted and the strategies used to construct and train the chosen CNN. Consequently, the reported performance varied widely, with accuracies of 91.63-100% in differentiating meningiomas, gliomas, and pituitary tumors (26 articles) and of 60.0-99.46% in distinguishing low-grade from high-grade gliomas (13 articles). The review provides a survey of the state of the art in CNN-based deep learning methods for brain tumor classification. Many networks demonstrated good performance, and it is not evident that any specific methodological choice greatly outperforms the alternatives, especially given the inconsistencies in the reporting of validation methods, performance metrics, and training data encountered. Few studies have focused on clinical usability.

Indexed as

brain tumor classificationclinical applicationclinical effectivenesscomputer-aided diagnosisconvolutional neural networkdeep learningmagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID36010200
PMCPMC9406354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.