Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010194›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Radiologist-Trained and -Tested (R2.2.4) Deep Learning Models for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks in Chest CT.

Parisa Kaviani, Bernardo C Bizzo, Subba R Digumarthy, Giridhar Dasegowda, Lina Karout, James Hillis, Nir Neumark, Mannudeep K Kalra, Keith J Dreyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Parisa KavianiMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0911-7507
Bernardo C BizzoMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Subba R DigumarthyMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Giridhar DasegowdaMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9246-8265
Lina KaroutMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
James HillisMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Nir NeumarkMass General Brigham Data Science Office, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Mannudeep K KalraMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Keith J DreyerMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Optimal anatomic coverage is important for radiation-dose optimization. We trained and tested (R2.2.4) two (R3-2) deep learning (DL) algorithms on a machine vision tool library platform (Cognex Vision Pro Deep Learning software) to recognize anatomic landmarks and classify chest CT as those with optimum, under-scanned, or over-scanned scan length. (2) Methods: To test our hypothesis, we performed a study with 428 consecutive chest CT examinations (mean age 70 ± 14 years; male:female 190:238) performed at one of the four hospitals. CT examinations from two hospitals were used to train the DL classification algorithms to identify lung apices and bases. The developed algorithms were then tested on the data from the remaining two hospitals. For each CT, we recorded the scan lengths above and below the lung apices and bases. Model performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. (3) Results: The two DL models for lung apex and bases had high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and areas under the curve (AUC) for identifying under-scanning (100%, 99%, 99%, and 0.999 (95% CI 0.996-1.000)) and over-scanning (99%, 99%, 99%, and 0.998 (95%CI 0.992-1.000)). (4) Conclusions: Our DL models can accurately identify markers for missing anatomic coverage and over-scanning in chest CTs.

Indexed as

chest CT examinationdeep learning modelsuboptimal chest CT imaging

Identifiers

PMID36010194
PMCPMC9407000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.