Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010174›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Quantitative Measurement of Pneumothorax Using Artificial Intelligence Management Model and Clinical Application.

Dohun Kim, Jae-Hyeok Lee, Si-Wook Kim, Jong-Myeon Hong, Sung-Jin Kim, Minji Song, Jong-Mun Choi, Sun-Yeop Lee, Hongjun Yoon, Jin-Young Yoo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dohun KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8304-0232
Jae-Hyeok LeeDeepnoid, Inc., Seoul 08376, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4406-0940
Si-Wook KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.
Jong-Myeon HongDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.
Sung-Jin KimDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.
Minji SongDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6546-7918
Jong-Mun ChoiDeepnoid, Inc., Seoul 08376, Korea.
Sun-Yeop LeeDeepnoid, Inc., Seoul 08376, Korea.
Hongjun YoonDeepnoid, Inc., Seoul 08376, Korea.
Jin-Young YooDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0007-1960
Chungbuk National University Hospital · KR

Funding

Chungbuk National University Hospital 3-202004030-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can be a solution for delayed or misdiagnosed pneumothorax. This study developed, a deep-learning-based AI model to estimate the pneumothorax amount on a chest radiograph and applied it to a treatment algorithm developed by experienced thoracic surgeons. U-net performed semantic segmentation and classification of pneumothorax and non-pneumothorax areas. The pneumothorax amount was measured using chest computed tomography (volume ratio, gold standard) and chest radiographs (area ratio, true label) and calculated using the AI model (area ratio, predicted label). Each value was compared and analyzed based on clinical outcomes. The study included 96 patients, of which 67 comprised the training set and the others the test set. The AI model showed an accuracy of 97.8%, sensitivity of 69.2%, a negative predictive value of 99.1%, and a dice similarity coefficient of 61.8%. In the test set, the average amount of pneumothorax was 15%, 16%, and 13% in the gold standard, predicted, and true labels, respectively. The predicted label was not significantly different from the gold standard (

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningpneumothoraxtrue label

Identifiers

PMID36010174
PMCPMC9406694
OpenAlexW4288423900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.