Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010173›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Breast Dense Tissue Segmentation with Noisy Labels: A Hybrid Threshold-Based and Mask-Based Approach.

Andrés Larroza, Francisco Javier Pérez-Benito, Juan-Carlos Perez-Cortes, Marta Román, Marina Pollán, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez, Dolores Salas-Trejo, María Casals, Rafael Llobet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andrés LarrozaInstituto Tecnológico de la Informática, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, 46022 València, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2182-3930
Francisco Javier Pérez-BenitoInstituto Tecnológico de la Informática, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, 46022 València, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6290-5644
Juan-Carlos Perez-CortesInstituto Tecnológico de la Informática, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, 46022 València, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6506-090X
Marta RománDepartment of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9076-8918
Marina PollánNational Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4328-1565
Beatriz Pérez-GómezNational Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4299-8214
Dolores Salas-TrejoValencian Breast Cancer Screening Program, General Directorate of Public Health, 46022 València, Spain.
María CasalsValencian Breast Cancer Screening Program, General Directorate of Public Health, 46022 València, Spain.
Rafael LlobetInstituto Tecnológico de la Informática, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, 46022 València, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8278-9740
Centro Tecnológico de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación en tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones (TIC) · ESGeneralitat Valenciana · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESHospital Del Mar · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III FEDER (PI17/00047)Instituto Valenciano de Competitividad Empresarial IMDEEA/2021/100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast density assessed from digital mammograms is a known biomarker related to a higher risk of developing breast cancer. Supervised learning algorithms have been implemented to determine this. However, the performance of these algorithms depends on the quality of the ground-truth information, which expert readers usually provide. These expert labels are noisy approximations to the ground truth, as there is both intra- and inter-observer variability among them. Thus, it is crucial to provide a reliable method to measure breast density from mammograms. This paper presents a fully automated method based on deep learning to estimate breast density, including breast detection, pectoral muscle exclusion, and dense tissue segmentation. We propose a novel confusion matrix (CM)-YNet model for the segmentation step. This architecture includes networks to model each radiologist's noisy label and gives the estimated ground-truth segmentation as well as two parameters that allow interaction with a threshold-based labeling tool. A multi-center study involving 1785 women whose "for presentation" mammograms were obtained from 11 different medical facilities was performed. A total of 2496 mammograms were used as the training corpus, and 844 formed the testing corpus. Additionally, we included a totally independent dataset from a different center, composed of 381 women with one image per patient. Each mammogram was labeled independently by two expert radiologists using a threshold-based tool. The implemented CM-Ynet model achieved the highest DICE score averaged over both test datasets (0.82±0.14) when compared to the closest dense-tissue segmentation assessment from both radiologists. The level of concordance between the two radiologists showed a DICE score of 0.76±0.17. An automatic breast density estimator based on deep learning exhibited higher performance when compared with two experienced radiologists. This suggests that modeling each radiologist's label allows for better estimation of the unknown ground-truth segmentation. The advantage of the proposed model is that it also provides the threshold parameters that enable user interaction with a threshold-based tool.

Indexed as

breast density segmentationdeep learningmammographynoisy labels

Identifiers

PMID36010173
PMCPMC9406546
OpenAlexW4288426654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.