Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010171›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study.

Kwang-Soon Song, Chang-Jin Yon, Yu-Ran Heo, Jae-Ho Lee, Seung-Bo Lee, Yeon-Kyoung Ko, Kyung-Jae Lee, Si-Wook Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kwang-Soon SongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, 1035 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, Korea.
Chang-Jin YonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, 1035 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3580-4175
Yu-Ran HeoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, 1035 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0170-7847
Jae-Ho LeeDepartment of Anatomy, Keimyung University College of Medicine, 1095, Dalgubeol-daero, Daegu 42601, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5562-0720
Seung-Bo LeeDepartment of Medical Informatics, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu 42601, Korea.
Yeon-Kyoung KoMaiT Co., Ltd., Daegu 41931, Korea.
Kyung-Jae LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, 1035 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, Korea.
Si-Wook LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, 1035 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2733-6992

Funding

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twenty-five cadaveric adult femora’s anteversion angles were measured to develop a highly efficient and reproducible femoral anteversion measurement method using computed tomography (CT). Digital photography captured the proximal femur’s two reference lines, head-to-neck (H-N) and head-to-greater trochanter (H-G). Six reference lines (A/B in transverse section; C, axial oblique section; D/E, conventional 3D reconstruction; and M, volumetric 3D reconstruction) from CT scans were used. The posterior condylar line was used as a distal femoral reference. As measured with the H-N and H-G lines, the anteversion means were 10.43° and 19.50°, respectively. Gross anteversion measured with the H-G line had less interobserver bias (ICC; H-N = 0.956, H-G = 0.982). The 2D transverse and volumetric 3D CT sections’ B/M lines were consistent with the H-N line (p: B = 0.925, M = 0.122) and the 2D axial oblique section’s C line was consistent with the H-G line (p < 0.1). The D/E lines differed significantly from the actual gross images (p < 0.05). Among several CT scan femoral anteversion measurement methods, the novel anteversion angle measurement method using CT scans’ axial oblique section was approximated with actual gross femoral anteversion angle from the femoral head to the greater trochanter.

Indexed as

axial oblique sectioncomputed tomographyfemoral anteversion

Identifiers

PMID36010171
PMCPMC9406648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.