Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010046›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Efficacy of a Robot-Assisted Intervention in Improving Learning Performance of Elementary School Children with Specific Learning Disorders.

Maria T Papadopoulou, Elpida Karageorgiou, Petros Kechayas, Nikoleta Geronikola, Chris Lytridis, Christos Bazinas, Efi Kourampa, Eleftheria Avramidou, Vassilis G Kaburlasos, Athanasios E Evangeliou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria T Papadopoulou4th Department of Pediatrics, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56403 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2076-5006
Elpida KarageorgiouChild & Parent Center S.A., Center for Special Education, 54351 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1260-7144
Petros Kechayas1st Psychiatric Clinic, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56403 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Nikoleta GeronikolaEuroaction S.A., 54655 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Chris LytridisHUMAIN-Lab, Department of Computer Science, International Hellenic University, 65404 Kavala, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9045-3833
Christos BazinasHUMAIN-Lab, Department of Computer Science, International Hellenic University, 65404 Kavala, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3780-5617
Efi KourampaChild & Parent Center S.A., Center for Special Education, 54351 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Eleftheria Avramidou1st Psychiatric Clinic, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56403 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Vassilis G KaburlasosHUMAIN-Lab, Department of Computer Science, International Hellenic University, 65404 Kavala, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1639-0627
Athanasios E Evangeliou4th Department of Pediatrics, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56403 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3878-8097
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRInternational Hellenic University · GREuromedica · GR

Funding

Co-funded by Greece and the European Union. Action "RESEARCH - DEVELOP - INNOVATE", cycle A, Intervention II, Operational Programme "Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation", NSRF (National Strategic Reference Framework) 2014-2020 Project no. Τ1Ε Project no. Τ1ΕDΚ-00929European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH - CREATE - INNOVATE (Project entitled "Social Robots as Tools in Special Education"; acronym SRTSE.) T1EDK-00929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: There has been significant recent interest in the potential role of social robots (SRs) in special education. Specific Learning Disorders (SpLDs) have a high prevalence in the student population, and early intervention with personalized special educational programs is crucial for optimal academic achievement. (2) Methods: We designed an intense special education intervention for children in the third and fourth years of elementary school with a diagnosis of a SpLD. Following confirmation of eligibility and informed consent, the participants were prospectively and randomly allocated to two groups: (a) the SR group, for which the intervention was delivered by the humanoid robot NAO with the assistance of a special education teacher and (b) the control group, for which the intervention was delivered by the special educator. All participants underwent pre- and post-intervention evaluation for outcome measures. (3) Results: 40 children (NAO = 19, control = 21, similar baseline characteristics) were included. Pre- and post-intervention evaluation showed comparable improvements in both groups in cognition skills (decoding, phonological awareness and reading comprehension), while between-group changes favored the NAO group only for some phonological awareness exercises. In total, no significant changes were found in any of the groups regarding the emotional/behavioral secondary outcomes. (4) Conclusion: NAO was efficient as a tutor for a human-supported intervention when compared to the gold-standard intervention for elementary school students with SpLDs.

Indexed as

humanoid robot NAOphonological awarenessreading comprehensionSocial Robots (SRs)special educationSpecific Learning Disorders (SpLDs)

Identifiers

PMID36010046
PMCPMC9406711
OpenAlexW4289109621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.