Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36009958›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Neonatal Early Onset Sepsis (EOS) Calculator plus Universal Serial Physical Examination (SPE): A Prospective Two-Step Implementation of a Neonatal EOS Prevention Protocol for Reduction of Sepsis Workup and Antibiotic Treatment.

Francesco Cavigioli, Francesca Viaroli, Irene Daniele, Michela Paroli, Luigi Guglielmetti, Elena Esposito, Francesco Cerritelli, Gianvincenzo Zuccotti, Gianluca Lista

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesco CavigioliNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, 20100 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9681-5356
Francesca ViaroliNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, 20100 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8629-1280
Irene DanieleNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, 20100 Milan, Italy.
Michela ParoliNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, 20100 Milan, Italy.
Luigi GuglielmettiNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, 20100 Milan, Italy.
Elena EspositoNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, 20100 Milan, Italy.
Francesco CerritelliNon-Profit Foundation C.O.ME. Collaboration, Centre for Osteopathic Medicine Collaboration, 65121 Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2963-9620
Gianvincenzo ZuccottiNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, 20100 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2795-9874
Gianluca ListaNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, 20100 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6636-5673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) guidelines lack consensus. Recent studies suggest three different options for EOS risk assessment among infants born ≥35 wks gestational age (GA), leading to different behaviors in the sepsis workup and antibiotic administration. A broad disparity in clinical practice is found in Neonatal Units, with a large number of non-infected newborns evaluated and treated for EOS. Broad spectrum antibiotics in early life may induce different short- and long-term adverse effects, longer hospitalization, and early mother-child separation. In this single-center prospective study, a total of 3002 neonates born in three periods between 2016 and 2020 were studied, and three different workup algorithms were compared: the first one was based on the categorical risk assessment; the second one was based on a Serial Physical Examination (SPE) strategy for infants with EOS risk factors; the third one associated an informatic tool (Neonatal EOS calculator) with a universal extension of the SPE strategy. The main objective of this study was to reduce the number of neonatal sepsis workups and the rate of antibiotic administration and favor rooming-in and mother−infant bonding without increasing the risk of sepsis and mortality. The combined strategy of universal SPE with the EOS Calculator showed a significant reduction of laboratory tests (from 33% to 6.6%; p < 0.01) and antibiotic treatments (from 8.5% to 1.4%; p < 0.01) in term and near-term newborns. EOS and mortality did not change significantly during the study period.

Indexed as

antibioticsearly onset sepsisinfectionmortalitynewbornsserial clinical examination

Identifiers

PMID36009958
PMCPMC9405114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.