Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36009956›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Therapeutic Options and Outcomes for the Treatment of Neonates and Preterms with Gram-Negative Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: A Systematic Review.

Lorenzo Chiusaroli, Cecilia Liberati, Maria Caseti, Luigi Rulli, Elisa Barbieri, Carlo Giaquinto, Daniele Donà

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Ceftazidime-Avibactam Treatment forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorenzo ChiusaroliDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department for Women's and Child's Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Cecilia LiberatiDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department for Women's and Child's Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0821-5757
Maria CasetiDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department for Women's and Child's Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Luigi RulliDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department for Women's and Child's Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Elisa BarbieriDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department for Women's and Child's Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0850-8784
Carlo GiaquintoDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department for Women's and Child's Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Daniele DonàDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department for Women's and Child's Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7105-2105
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria represent a challenge in the neonatal population due to disease severity and limited therapeutic possibilities compared to adults. The spread of antimicrobial resistance and drug availability differ significantly worldwide. The incidence of MDR bacteria has constantly risen, causing an increase in morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs in both high-income (HIC) and low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Therefore, more evidence is needed to define the possible use of newer molecules and to optimize combination regimens for the oldest antimicrobials in neonates. This systematic review aims to identify and critically appraise the current antimicrobial treatment options and the relative outcomes for MDR and XDR Gram-negative bacterial infections in the neonatal population. (2) Methods: A literature search for the treatment of MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections in neonates (term and preterm) was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library. Studies reporting data on single-patient-level outcomes related to a specific antibiotic treatment for MDR Gram-negative bacterial infection in children were included. Studies reporting data from adults and children were included if single-neonate-level information could be identified. We focused our research on four MDROs:

Indexed as

A. baumanniiEnterobacteriaceaeGram-negativeMDR bacterianeonatesoutcomeP. aeruginosapretermreviewtermtreatment

Identifiers

PMID36009956
PMCPMC9404799
OpenAlexW4291670871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.