Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36009653›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Rapid Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION Sequencing Workflow for Campylobacter jejuni Identification in Broilers on Site—A Proof-of-Concept Study

Clara Marin, Francisco Marco-Jiménez, Llucia Martínez-Priego, Griselda De Marco-Romero, Vicente Soriano-Chirona, Laura Lorenzo-Rebenaque, Giuseppe D'Auria

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Nanopore sequencing in veterinary medicine: from concepts to clinical applications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Holistic Strategies to ControlMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Clara MarinInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, 46113 Alfara del Patriarca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6152-3778
Francisco Marco-JiménezInstitute of Science and Animal Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5226-4118
Llucia Martínez-PriegoServicio de Secuenciación y Bioinformática, Fundación Para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO-Salud Pública), 46022 València, Spain.
Griselda De Marco-RomeroServicio de Secuenciación y Bioinformática, Fundación Para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO-Salud Pública), 46022 València, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2344-9348
Vicente Soriano-ChironaServicio de Secuenciación y Bioinformática, Fundación Para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO-Salud Pública), 46022 València, Spain.
Laura Lorenzo-RebenaqueInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, 46113 Alfara del Patriarca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4759-258X
Giuseppe D'AuriaServicio de Secuenciación y Bioinformática, Fundación Para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO-Salud Pública), 46022 València, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0672-2541
Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ESUniversidad Cardenal Herrera CEU · ESUniversitat Politècnica de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacter is recognised as one of the most important foodborne bacteria, with a worldwide health and socioeconomic impact. This bacterium is one of the most important zoonotic players in poultry, where efficient and fast detection methods are required. Current official culture methods for Campylobacter enumeration in poultry usually include >44 h of culture and >72 h for identification, thus requiring at least five working shifts (ISO/TS 10272-2:2017). Here, we have assembled a portable sequencing kit composed of the Bento Lab and the MinION and developed a workflow for on-site farm use that is able to detect and report the presence of Campylobacter from caecal samples in less than five hours from sampling time, as well as the relationship of Campylobacter with other caecal microbes. Beyond that, our workflow may offer a cost-effective and practical method of microbiologically monitoring poultry at the farm. These results would demonstrate the possibility of carrying out rapid on-site screening to monitor the health status of the poultry farm/flock during the production chain.

Indexed as

16S RNABento Labfoodbornemicrobiotapoultry

Identifiers

PMID36009653
PMCPMC9405271
OpenAlexW4291414563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.