Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36009648›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Bibliometric Analysis of Literature in Snake Venom-Related Research Worldwide (1933-2022).

Fajar Sofyantoro, Donan Satria Yudha, Kenny Lischer, Tri Rini Nuringtyas, Wahyu Aristyaning Putri, Wisnu Ananta Kusuma, Yekti Asih Purwestri, Respati Tri Swasono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fajar SofyantoroFaculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-0952-1956
Donan Satria YudhaFaculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.
Kenny LischerFaculty of Engineering, University of Indonesia, Jakarta 16424, Indonesia.
Tri Rini NuringtyasFaculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-8011-8396
Wahyu Aristyaning PutriFaculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.
Wisnu Ananta KusumaDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-3682-244X
Yekti Asih PurwestriFaculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.
Respati Tri SwasonoDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snake envenomation is a severe economic and health concern affecting countries worldwide. Snake venom carries a wide variety of small peptides and proteins with various immunological and pharmacological properties. A few key research areas related to snake venom, including its applications in treating cancer and eradicating antibiotic-resistant bacteria, have been gaining significant attention in recent years. The goal of the current study was to analyze the global profile of literature in snake venom research. This study presents a bibliometric review of snake venom-related research documents indexed in the Scopus database between 1933 and 2022. The overall number of documents published on a global scale was 2999, with an average annual production of 34 documents. Brazil produced the highest number of documents (

Indexed as

bibliometrysnake venomVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID36009648
PMCPMC9405337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.