Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36009373›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

Pilot Study: Immune Checkpoints Polymorphisms in Greek Primary Breast Cancer Patients.

Nyanbol Kuol, Xu Yan, Vanessa Barriga, Jimsheena Karakkat, Stamatis Vassilaros, Ioannis Fyssas, Anastasios Tsimpanis, Sarah Fraser, Kulmira Nurgali, Vasso Apostolopoulos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nyanbol KuolInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3030, Australia.
Xu YanInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3030, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8547-4210
Vanessa BarrigaInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3030, Australia.
Jimsheena KarakkatInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3030, Australia.
Stamatis VassilarosProlipsis Medical Diagnostic Centre, 11528 Athens, Greece.
Ioannis FyssasProlipsis Medical Diagnostic Centre, 11528 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3275-8161
Anastasios TsimpanisProlipsis Medical Diagnostic Centre, 11528 Athens, Greece.
Sarah FraserInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3030, Australia.
Kulmira NurgaliInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3030, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2597-6929
Vasso ApostolopoulosInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3030, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6788-2771
Victoria University · AUAthens Medical Center · GRAustralian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

The Thelma and Paul Constantinou Foundation philanthropic funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent and second leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide. Despite early detection and better treatment therapies, 30% of early-stage breast cancer patients still develop recurrent disease. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease comprising several molecular subtypes, commonly classified into clinical subtypes based on the hormone receptor status. These subtypes included luminal A and luminal B, which have different prognoses. Breast cancer development and progression involve many factors. Polymorphisms of PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 genes have been previously associated with high risk and prognosis of cancer. However, no studies have associated PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 polymorphisms with primary breast cancer subtypes. Hence, this study evaluated functional single nucleotide polymorphisms of PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 with primary breast cancer subtypes, luminal A, and luminal B. In addition, we evaluated the PD-L1 protein expression in relation to primary breast cancer subtypes and stages. Results: There were no significant differences in the allele frequencies of PD-1 polymorphisms (rs2227981 G>A, rs7421861 A>G, and rs11568821 C>T) and PD-L1 polymorphisms (rs10815225 C>T and rs2282055 T>G) when compared with the general European population. However, a significant difference was detected in one of the PD-L2 polymorphisms (rs1009759 A>G), with the G allele higher in breast cancer patients than in the general European population. A higher prevalence of the T allele of PD-L1 polymorphism rs2282055 T>G was observed in luminal B breast cancer patients compared with luminal A. No significant difference was detected in other polymorphisms. We also observed that the PD-L1 rs2282055 TT genotype was more prevalent in luminal B breast cancer patients compared with luminal A. Our results found no association of the selected SNPs in the PDCD1 gene with breast cancer risk. Similarly, the protein expression data showed that PD-L1 and PD-L2 are associated with an aggressive phenotype, Luminal B, and advanced breast cancer stage. Conclusion: These findings suggest that immune checkpoint polymorphisms are associated with the risk and subtypes of breast cancer.

Indexed as

breast cancerimmune checkpoint inhibitorsluminal A and Bsingle nucleotide polymorphismssubtypes

Identifiers

PMID36009373
PMCPMC9405402
OpenAlexW4289111709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.