Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36009157›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Decoding Task-Based fMRI Data with Graph Neural Networks, Considering Individual Differences.

Maham Saeidi, Waldemar Karwowski, Farzad V Farahani, Krzysztof Fiok, P A Hancock, Ben D Sawyer, Leonardo Christov-Moore, Pamela K Douglas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maham SaeidiDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7768-682X
Waldemar KarwowskiDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9134-3441
Farzad V FarahaniDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.
Krzysztof FiokDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5711-1498
P A HancockDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.
Ben D SawyerDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.
Leonardo Christov-MooreInstitute of Advanced Consciousness Studies, Santa Monica, CA 90403, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1589-5321
Pamela K DouglasSchool of Modeling, Simulation, and Training Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.

Funding

Structural and Functional Biomarkers of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderK01MH110645 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DOUGLAS, PK · 2017 to 2020
$632k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH110645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Task fMRI provides an opportunity to analyze the working mechanisms of the human brain during specific experimental paradigms. Deep learning models have increasingly been applied for decoding and encoding purposes study to representations in task fMRI data. More recently, graph neural networks, or neural networks models designed to leverage the properties of graph representations, have recently shown promise in task fMRI decoding studies. Here, we propose an end-to-end graph convolutional network (GCN) framework with three convolutional layers to classify task fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project dataset. We compared the predictive performance of our GCN model across four of the most widely used node embedding algorithms-NetMF, RandNE, Node2Vec, and Walklets-to automatically extract the structural properties of the nodes in the functional graph. The empirical results indicated that our GCN framework accurately predicted individual differences (0.978 and 0.976) with the NetMF and RandNE embedding methods, respectively. Furthermore, to assess the effects of individual differences, we tested the classification performance of the model on sub-datasets divided according to gender and fluid intelligence. Experimental results indicated significant differences in the classification predictions of gender, but not high/low fluid intelligence fMRI data. Our experiments yielded promising results and demonstrated the superior ability of our GCN in modeling task fMRI data.

Indexed as

brain decodingclassificationgraph convolutional networkhuman connectome projecttask fMRI

Identifiers

PMID36009157
PMCPMC9405908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.