Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36009101›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Effects of Stimulus Frequency, Intensity, and Sex on the Autonomic Response to Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

Hirotake Yokota, Mutsuaki Edama, Ryo Hirabayashi, Chie Sekine, Naofumi Otsuru, Kei Saito, Sho Kojima, Shota Miyaguchi, Hideaki Onishi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hirotake YokotaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0752-5574
Mutsuaki EdamaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2784-6466
Ryo HirabayashiInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9698-9276
Chie SekineInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0687-605X
Naofumi OtsuruInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.
Kei SaitoInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.
Sho KojimaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.
Shota MiyaguchiInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.
Hideaki OnishiInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.
Niigata University of Health and Welfare · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H01090Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K19429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine how transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) alters autonomic nervous activity by comparing the effects of different tVNS frequencies and current intensities. We also investigated the sex-dependent autonomic response to tVNS. Thirty-five healthy adult participants were stimulated using a tVNS stimulator at the left cymba conchae while sitting on a reclining chair; tVNS-induced waveform changes were then recorded for different stimulus frequencies (Experiment 1: 3.0 mA at 100 Hz, 25 Hz, 10 Hz, 1 Hz, and 0 Hz (no stimulation)) and current intensities (Experiment 2: 100 Hz at 3.0 mA, 1.0 mA, 0.2 mA (below sensory threshold), and 0 mA (no stimulation)) using an electrocardiogram. Pulse widths were set at 250 µs in both experiment 1 and 2. Changes in heart rate (HR), root-mean-square of the difference between two successive R waves (RMSSD), and the ratio between low-frequency (LF) (0.04-0.15 Hz) and high-frequency (HF) (0.15-0.40 Hz) bands (LF/HF) in spectral analysis, which indicates sympathetic and parasympathetic activity, respectively, in heart rate variability (HRV), were recorded for analysis. Although stimulation at all frequencies significantly reduced HR (

Indexed as

heart rate variabilityparasympathetic nervous activitysex differencesstimulus frequencystimulus intensitytranscutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS)

Identifiers

PMID36009101
PMCPMC9405815
OpenAlexW4289985796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.