Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36009094›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Predicting Dyslexia in Adolescents from Eye Movements during Free Painting Viewing.

Alae Eddine El Hmimdi, Lindsey M Ward, Themis Palpanas, Vivien Sainte Fare Garnot, Zoï Kapoula

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Visual and Oculomotor Function in Developmental Dyslexia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. [The application of machine learning in the auxiliary diagnosis of specific learning disorder].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alae Eddine El HmimdiOrasis Eye Analytics and Rehabilitation, CNRS Spinoff up, 12 rue Lacretelle, 75015 Paris, France.
Lindsey M WardIRIS Lab, Neurophysiology of Binocular Motor Control and Vision, CNRS UAR 2022, University of Paris, 45 rue des Saints Pères, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5358-3535
Themis PalpanasLIPADE, French University Institute (IUF), Laboratoire d'Informatique Paris Descartes, University of Paris, 45 Rue Des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France.
Vivien Sainte Fare GarnotOrasis Eye Analytics and Rehabilitation, CNRS Spinoff up, 12 rue Lacretelle, 75015 Paris, France.
Zoï KapoulaOrasis Eye Analytics and Rehabilitation, CNRS Spinoff up, 12 rue Lacretelle, 75015 Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is known that dyslexics present eye movement abnormalities. Previously, we have shown that eye movement abnormalities during reading or during saccade and vergence testing can predict dyslexia successfully. The current study further examines this issue focusing on eye movements during free exploration of paintings; the dataset was provided by a study in our laboratory carried by Ward and Kapoula. Machine learning (ML) classifiers were applied to eye movement features extracted by the software AIDEAL: a velocity threshold analysis reporting amplitude speed and disconjugacy of horizontal saccades. In addition, a new feature was introduced that concerns only the very short periods during which the eyes were moving, one to the left the other to the right; such periods occurred mostly during fixations between saccades; we calculated a global index of the frequency of such disconjugacy segments, of their duration and their amplitude. Such continuous evaluation of disconjugacy throughout the time series of eye movements differs from the disconjugacy feature that describes inequality of the saccade amplitude between the two eyes. The results show that both AIDEAL features, and the Disconjugacy Global Index (DGI) enable successful categorization of dyslexics from non-dyslexics, at least when applying this analysis to the specific paintings used in the present study. We suggest that this high power of predictability arises from both the content of the paintings selected and the physiologic relevance of eye movement features extracted by the AIDEAL and the DGI.

Indexed as

dyslexiaeye movementfeature engineeringmachine learningpaintings free explorationsaccadesvergence

Identifiers

PMID36009094
PMCPMC9405842
OpenAlexW4289705143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.