Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36009086›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2022

Psychosocial Interventions for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the CADDRA Guidelines Work GROUP.

Valerie Tourjman, Gill Louis-Nascan, Ghalib Ahmed, Anaïs DuBow, Hubert Côté, Nadia Daly, George Daoud, Stacey Espinet, Joan Flood, Emilie Gagnier-Marandola and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sensory white noise in clinical ADHD: Who benefits from noise, and who performs worse?Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Valerie TourjmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.
Gill Louis-NascanDepartment of Psychiatry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.
Ghalib AhmedDepartments of Family Medicine and Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.
Anaïs DuBowDepartment of Psychiatry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.
Hubert CôtéDepartment of Psychiatry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.
Nadia DalyDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
George DaoudDepartment of Psychiatry, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada.
Stacey EspinetCADDRA-Canadian ADHD Resource Alliance, Toronto, ON M5A 3X9, Canada.
Joan FloodDepartment of Psychiatry, The Shoniker Clinic, Scarborough, ON M1E 4B9, Canada.
Emilie Gagnier-MarandolaDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.
Martin GignacChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Division, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.
Gemma GraziosiDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
Zeeshan MansuriBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Joseph SadekDepartment of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7234-1814
Université de Montréal · CABoston Children's Hospital · USMcGill University · CADalhousie University · CADigital Research Alliance of CanadaThe Scarborough Hospital · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple psychosocial interventions to treat ADHD symptoms have been developed and empirically tested. However, no clear recommendations exist regarding the utilization of these interventions for treating core ADHD symptoms across different populations. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis by the CADDRA Guidelines work Group was to generate such recommendations, using recent evidence. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and meta-analyses (MA) from 2010 to 13 February 2020 were searched in PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, EBM Reviews and CINAHL. Studies of populations with significant levels of comorbidities were excluded. Thirty-one studies were included in the qualitative synthesis (22 RCT, 9 MA) and 24 studies (19 RCT, 5 MA) were included in the quantitative synthesis. Using three-level meta-analyses to pool results of multiple observations from each RCT, as well as four-level meta-analyses to pool results from multiples outcomes and multiple studies of each MA, we generated recommendations using the GRADE approach for: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Physical Exercise and Mind-Body intervention; Caregiver intervention; School-based and Executive intervention; and other interventions for core ADHD symptoms across Preschooler, Child, Adolescent and Adult populations. The evidence supports a recommendation for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for adults and Caregiver intervention for Children, but not for preschoolers. There were not enough data to provide recommendations for the other types of psychosocial interventions. Our results are in line with previous meta-analytic assessments; however, they provide a more in-depth assessment of the effect of psychosocial intervention on core ADHD symptoms.

Indexed as

ADHDcaregiver interventionsmind–body interventionphysical exercisepsychological interventionspsychosocial treatmentschool-based interventions

Identifiers

PMID36009086
PMCPMC9406006
OpenAlexW4289314083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.