ArticleBiomolecules2022
Ethanolic Fermentation of Rye Mashes: Factors Influencing the Formation of Aldehydes and Process Efficiency.
Article in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Conventional and Organic Cultivation Methods on Fermentation Efficiency and Volatile Composition of Rye Distillates.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fermentation Efficiency and Profile of Volatile Compounds in Rye Grain Mashes from Crops Fertilised with Agrifood Waste Ashes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High concentrations of aldehydes may result in poor-quality agricultural distillate. We investigate the influence of the method of mash preparation, the initial pH of the mashes, and different yeast strains on the fermentation efficiency and concentration of aldehydes from C2 (acetaldehyde) to C7 (enanthaldehyde) in rye mashes. The tested factors were revealed to have a differentiated influence on both the process efficiency and the concentrations of aldehydes, especially in the case of the dominant acetaldehyde. Mashes obtained from steamed rye grain showed significantly higher fermentation efficiencies than those prepared by the pressureless method. Increasing the pH of the sweet mashes from 4.5 to 6.0 resulted in significantly higher concentrations of acetaldehyde, especially in the case of steamed rye grain. Moreover, an increase in the concentrations of other aldehydes, i.e., from C3 (propionaldehyde) to C5 (valer- and isovaleraldehyde) was observed. A high fermentation efficiency and the lowest acetaldehyde concentrations were obtained from steamed rye mashes with an initial pH of 4.5, fermented using the yeast strains DistilaMax GW and DistilaMax HT. DistilaMax HT yeast also provided a relatively low concentration of acetaldehyde in mashes with an initial pH in the range of 4.5-5.5 prepared by the energy-saving pressureless method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.