Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36008882›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2022

In vivo hamster cheek pouch subepithelial ablation, biomaterial injection, and localization: pilot study.

Ilan Gabay, Kaushik Subramanian, Liam Andrus, Andrew DuPlissis, Murat Yildirim, Adela Ben-Yakar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilan GabayUniversity of Texas at Austin, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States, United States.
Kaushik SubramanianUniversity of Texas at Austin, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States, United States.
Liam AndrusUniversity of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States, United States.
Andrew DuPlissisUniversity of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States, United States.
Murat YildirimUniversity of Texas at Austin, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States, United States.
Adela Ben-YakarUniversity of Texas at Austin, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States, United States.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Comprehensive Training Program in Imaging Science and InformaticsT32EB007507 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARKEY, MIA K, RYLANDER, HENRY GRADY · 2009 to 2024
$2.7M
Ultrafast Laser Phonosurgery for Biomaterial Localization in Scarred Vocal FoldsR01DC014783 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BEN-YAKAR, ADELA · 2016 to 2020
$2.3M
Developing next generation multiphoton systems to reveal cortico-thalamic interactions underlying short-term memory in behaving miceR00EB027706 · NIBIB · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI YILDIRIM, MURAT · 2022 to 2024
$747k
NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB027706NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007507NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceThe creation of subepithelial voids within scarred vocal folds via ultrafast laser ablation may help in localization of injectable biomaterials toward a clinically viable therapy for vocal fold scarring.

aimWe aim to prove that subepithelial voids can be created in a live animal model and that the ablation process does not engender additional scar formation. We demonstrate localization and long-term retention of an injectable biomaterial within subepithelial voids. APPROACH: A benchtop nonlinear microscope was used to create subepithelial voids within healthy and scarred cheek pouches of four Syrian hamsters. A model biomaterial, polyethylene glycol tagged with rhodamine dye, was then injected into these voids using a custom injection setup. Follow-up imaging studies at 1- and 2-week time points were performed using the same benchtop nonlinear microscope. Subsequent histology assessed void morphology and biomaterial retention.

resultsFocused ultrashort pulses can be used to create large subepithelial voids in vivo. Our analysis suggests that the ablation process does not introduce any scar formation. Moreover, these studies indicate localization, and, more importantly, long-term retention of the model biomaterial injected into these voids. Both nonlinear microscopy and histological examination indicate the presence of biomaterial-filled voids in healthy and scarred cheek pouches 2 weeks postoperation.

conclusionsWe successfully demonstrated subepithelial void formation, biomaterial injection, and biomaterial retention in a live animal model. This pilot study is an important step toward clinical acceptance of a new type of therapy for vocal fold scarring. Future long-term studies on large animals will utilize a miniaturized surgical probe to further assess the clinical viability of such a therapy.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCicatrixAnimalsCheekCricetinaeMesocricetusPilot ProjectsVocal CordsBiocompatible Materialsablation of tissuehamster cheek pouchin vivononlinear microscopyultrafast lasersvocal fold scarring

Identifiers

PMID36008882
PMCPMC9407625
OpenAlexW4293233799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.