Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36008821›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2022

Capturing the antibiotic resistome of preterm infants reveals new benefits of probiotic supplementation.

Allison K Guitor, Efrah I Yousuf, Amogelang R Raphenya, Eileen K Hutton, Katherine M Morrison, Andrew G McArthur, Gerard D Wright, Jennifer C Stearns

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Antibiotic-perturbed microbiota and the role of probiotics.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Understanding the influence of the microbiome on childhood infections.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Allison K GuitorDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Efrah I YousufDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Amogelang R RaphenyaDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Eileen K HuttonDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Katherine M MorrisonDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Andrew G McArthurDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Gerard D WrightDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Jennifer C StearnsDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. stearns@mcmaster.ca.
McMaster University · CADiscovery Centre · CA

Funding

CIHR FRN-148463CIHR GSD-164145CIHR PJT-156214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProbiotic use in preterm infants can mitigate the impact of antibiotic exposure and reduce rates of certain illnesses; however, the benefit on the gut resistome, the collection of antibiotic resistance genes, requires further investigation. We hypothesized that probiotic supplementation of early preterm infants (born < 32-week gestation) while in hospital reduces the prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes associated with pathogenic bacteria in the gut. We used a targeted capture approach to compare the resistome from stool samples collected at the term corrected age of 40 weeks for two groups of preterm infants (those that routinely received a multi-strain probiotic during hospitalization and those that did not) with samples from full-term infants at 10 days of age to identify if preterm birth or probiotic supplementation impacted the resistome. We also compared the two groups of preterm infants up to 5 months of age to identify persistent antibiotic resistance genes.

resultsAt the term corrected age, or 10 days of age for the full-term infants, we found over 80 antibiotic resistance genes in the preterm infants that did not receive probiotics that were not identified in either the full-term or probiotic-supplemented preterm infants. More genes associated with antibiotic inactivation mechanisms were identified in preterm infants unexposed to probiotics at this collection time-point compared to the other infants. We further linked these genes to mobile genetic elements and Enterobacteriaceae, which were also abundant in their gut microbiomes. Various genes associated with aminoglycoside and beta-lactam resistance, commonly found in pathogenic bacteria, were retained for up to 5 months in the preterm infants that did not receive probiotics.

conclusionsThis pilot survey of preterm infants shows that probiotics administered after preterm birth during hospitalization reduced the diversity and prevented persistence of antibiotic resistance genes in the gut microbiome. The benefits of probiotic use on the microbiome and the resistome should be further explored in larger groups of infants. Due to its high sensitivity and lower sequencing cost, our targeted capture approach can facilitate these surveys to further address the implications of resistance genes persisting into infancy without the need for large-scale metagenomic sequencing. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Premature BirthProbioticsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticsGut microbiotaPreterm infantsProbioticsResistomeTargeted capture

Identifiers

PMID36008821
PMCPMC9414150
OpenAlexW4293106355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.