ArticleBMC health services research2022
Access to infertility care services towards Universal Health Coverage is a right and not an option.
Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding pathways from primary health care to universal health coverage outcomes: a realist review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review of challenges and prospective recommendations of medically assisted reproductive technology in developing countries.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- A realist evaluation of the development, implementation and outcomes of the first public ART Centre in Morocco.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Global, regional, and national burden of female infertility and trends from 1990 to 2021 with projections to 2050 based on the GBD 2021 analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Journey of infertile couples: scoping the barriers for infertility care among infertile women in Morocco.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Article
- Tele-rehabilitation in rural Nepal: a systematic review of effectiveness, barriers, and strategic directions for digital health equity.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Management of infertility among primary health care physicians in Morocco: a cross-sectional study.The Pan African medical journal · 2025Article
- Knowledge gaps among healthcare professionals regarding infertility: Exploring educational needs in primary healthcare setting-Morocco.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Article
- Policy action points and approaches to promote fertility care in The Gambia: Findings from a mixed-methods study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Mapping maternal and infant health in Morocco: A global scoping review of themes, gaps, and the "unseen" in the published health research literature, 2000-2022.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Experiences of infertility among couples in Morocco.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2024Article
- Exploring the challenges of public health nurses in the management of infertility in Northern Ghana: a qualitative descriptive study.BMJ open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Morocco, the national health plan 2025 was developed to promote Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) services for all. The principal aim was to achieve the Universal Health Coverage of SRH by 2030. For many years, health authorities' efforts had focused on reducing maternal mortality through a widespread access to antenatal and obstetric care and family planning services. This has resulted in a significant gap between the availability of SRH components, namely obstetric and family planning care, and access to infertility services including Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). The objective of this study is to answer two important questions. First, why some SRH programs and services are given priority by international and national political leaders while infertility care receives little attention; second, what are the factors that influence this prioritization?
methodsWe used Shiffman and Smith's framework composed of four elements: the strength of the actors involved in the initiative, the power of the ideas they use to represent the health problem, the nature of the political contexts in which they operate and the characteristics of the services. We added a fifth element to the framework, the outcome. We applied this framework to the case of infertility services in Morocco. We conducted a desk review and interviews with actors involved in SRH and infertility care advocates as well as with decision makers involved in implementing Universal Health Coverage (UHC).
resultsOur results showed that despite the efforts made by the advocates of infertility care; the enactment in 2019 of a law regulating infertility care services; and the presence of two Assisted Reproductive Technology Units in the public sector, infertility services remain at an early stage of development hampered by multiple challenges. Among others, a lack of political entrepreneurs to ensure a strong leadership; the political windows were often missed; community members lacked consensus on a coherent public positioning of the problem, and advocates' perception and power of the idea lacked evidence and precise indicators of the problem.
conclusionTo ensure the convergence and alignment of all stakeholders, it is recommended to translate the regulation of infertility into measurable activities with defined human and financial resources, equitable fertility health coverage, and quality fertility care to respond to women and infertile couples' needs, rights and dignity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.