Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36008798›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2022

Assessing whether genetic scores explain extra variation in birthweight, when added to clinical and anthropometric measures.

Maneka Haulder, Alice E Hughes, Robin N Beaumont, Bridget A Knight, Andrew T Hattersley, Beverley M Shields, Rachel M Freathy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maneka HaulderInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Alice E HughesInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Robin N BeaumontInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Bridget A KnightInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Andrew T HattersleyInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Beverley M Shields *Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK.
Rachel M Freathy *Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, UK. r.freathy@exeter.ac.uk.
University of Exeter · GBRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman birthweight is a complex, multifactorial trait. Maternal characteristics contribute to birthweight variation by influencing the intrauterine environment. Variation explained by genetic effects is also important, but their contributions have not been assessed alongside other key determinants. We aimed to investigate variance in birthweight explained by genetic scores in addition to easily-measurable clinical and anthropometric variables.

methodsWe analysed 549 European-ancestry parent-offspring trios from a UK community-based birth cohort. We investigated variance explained in birthweight (adjusted for sex and gestational age) in multivariable linear regression models including genetic scores, routinely-measured maternal characteristics, and parental anthropometric variables. We used R-Squared (R

resultsMaternal and fetal genetic scores together explained 6.0% variance in birthweight. A model containing maternal age, weight, smoking, parity and 28-week fasting glucose explained 21.7% variance. Maternal genetic score explained additional variance when added to maternal characteristics (Adj-R

conclusionsGenetic scores account for variance explained in birthweight in addition to easily measurable clinical variables. Parental heights partially capture fetal genotype and its contribution to birthweight, but genetic scores explain additional variance. While the genetic contribution is modest, it is comparable to that of individual clinical characteristics such as parity, which suggests that genetics could be included in tools aiming to predict risk of high or low birthweights.

Indexed as

Infant, Low Birth WeightBirth WeightFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal AgeParityPregnancyBirthweightFetalGenetic scoreIntrauterine environmentMaternalVariance

Identifiers

PMID36008798
PMCPMC9414111
OpenAlexW4293240338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.