ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022
Comparison of image quality and depiction of microscopic fat at 2-D and 3-D T1-Weighted (T1W) chemical shift (dual-echo) MRI for evaluation of adrenal adenomas.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare image quality and detection of microscopic fat in adrenal adenomas imaged with 2-D and 3-D chemical shift imaging (CSI) and, to derive parameters which best match 2-D and 3-D-CSI.
methodsThis two-phase, retrospective, and phantom + prospective study was IRB approved. First, a retrospective assessment of 50 consecutive adrenal adenomas imaged at 1.5 T with 2-D (TR minimum, Flip Angle [FA] 70°, TE 2.2/4.4 ms.) and 3-D (TR minimum, FA 10°, TE 2.2/4.4 ms.] CSI was performed. Second, phantom (varied fat: water concentration) experiments guided a prospective assessment of 12 consecutive adrenal adenomas imaged at 1.5 T with 3-D CSI (FA 10°, 18°). Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated: image quality, signal intensity (SI) cancellation (5-point Likert scale), and CSI-index ([SI.In.Phase-SI.Opposed.Phase/SI.In.Phase]*100).
results2-D-CSI yielded higher image quality (p < 0.001) and, subjectively (p < 0.001) and quantitatively (p < 0.001) had more SI cancellation from microscopic fat. Proportion of adenomas with no detectable microscopic fat (3-D; 26-36% subjectively, 18-24% quantitatively [CSI-index < 16.5%] versus 2-D; 20-22% subjectively, 6-8% quantitatively) differed (p = 0.008-0.08 subjectively, 0.008-0.03 quantitatively) by CSI technique. Phantom experiments indicated 18°FA 3-D-CSI compared favorably to 70° 2-D-CSI for fat detection between 5% and 50%. In vivo, there was no differences in subjective or quantitative SI cancellation comparing 18°3D-CSI and 2D-CSI (p = 0.16-0.56 and 0.73-0.60). Greater SI cancellation occurred with 18°3D compared to 10°3D-CSI evaluated subjectively (p = 0.003-0.01).
conclusion2-D CSI has subjectively higher image quality and shows more signal intensity loss from microscopic fat in adrenal adenomas compared to 10° flip angle 3-D-CSI. Increasing the 3-D flip angle to 18° more closely matches depiction of microscopic fat to 2-D-CSI at 1.5 T.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.