ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2022
The effect of aging on carotid artery wall mechanics during maximal resistance exercise.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proton-Sensing G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Their Potential Role in Exercise Regulation of Arterial Function.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Biomechanical and histomorphometric characterization of the melatonin treatment effect in the carotid artery subjected to hypobaric hypoxia.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Effect of Acute Resistance Exercise and Resistance Exercise Training on Central Pulsatile Hemodynamics and Large Artery Stiffness: Part I.Pulse (Basel, Switzerland)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAge-related stiffening of the large elastic arteries (e.g., common carotid artery [CCA]) may impair wall dynamics (i.e., strain) and amplify transmission of pulsatile blood flow into the brain with large increases in pressure that occur during maximal resistance exercise (RE). The purpose of this study was to compare CCA arterial wall dynamics, central hemodynamics, and cerebral blood velocity responses during maximal RE between young and older adults.
methodsThirty-one young (YA; 26 ± 5 yrs; 23.8 ± 3.3 kg/m
resultsOlder adults had greater reductions in CCA strain time to peak from baseline to maximal RE (345 ± 39 to 242 ± 52 ms) than YA (308 ± 35 to 247 ± 42 ms; interaction effect, p < 0.01). MCA velocity was similar between YA and OA during maximal RE (p = 0.48), despite a greater arterial pressor response in OA (p < 0.01).
conclusionThese data suggest cerebral blood velocity responds similarly during maximal RE among OA compared to YA, despite subtle age-related differences in the pressor and extracranial vascular response during maximal RE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.