Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36008687›Full record

ArticleNature cancer2022

Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy diminishes oocyte number and quality in mice.

Amy L Winship, Lauren R Alesi, Sneha Sant, Jessica M Stringer, Aldana Cantavenera, Teharn Hegarty, Carolina Lliberos Requesens, Seng H Liew, Urooza Sarma, Meaghan J Griffiths and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mice lacking NF-ĸB1 undergo premature ovarian aging.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Multi-omics profiling revealsTranslational lung cancer research · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amy L Winship *Development and Stem Cell Program and Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Lauren R Alesi *Development and Stem Cell Program and Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Sneha Sant *Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jessica M StringerDevelopment and Stem Cell Program and Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Aldana CantaveneraDevelopment and Stem Cell Program and Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Teharn HegartyDevelopment and Stem Cell Program and Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Carolina Lliberos RequesensDevelopment and Stem Cell Program and Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Seng H LiewDevelopment and Stem Cell Program and Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Urooza SarmaDevelopment and Stem Cell Program and Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Meaghan J GriffithsDevelopment and Stem Cell Program and Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Nadeen ZerafaDevelopment and Stem Cell Program and Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Stephen B FoxDivision of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7648-8896
Emmaline BrownDivision of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Franco CaramiaDivision of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5086-2544
Pirooz ZareieDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6000-2305
Nicole L La GrutaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Kelly-Anne PhillipsSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andreas StrasserThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5020-4891
Sherene Loi *Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. sherene.loi@petermac.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6137-9171
Karla J Hutt *Development and Stem Cell Program and Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. karla.hutt@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5111-8389
Monash University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUDiscovery Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of fertility is a major concern for female reproductive-age cancer survivors, since a common side-effect of conventional cytotoxic cancer therapies is permanent damage to the ovary. While immunotherapies are increasingly becoming a standard of care for many cancers-including in the curative setting-their impacts on ovarian function and fertility are unknown. We evaluated the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors blocking programmed cell death protein ligand 1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 on the ovary using tumor-bearing and tumor-free mouse models. We find that immune checkpoint inhibition increases immune cell infiltration and tumor necrosis factor-α expression within the ovary, diminishes the ovarian follicular reserve and impairs the ability of oocytes to mature and ovulate. These data demonstrate that immune checkpoint inhibitors have the potential to impair both immediate and future fertility, and studies in women should be prioritized. Additionally, fertility preservation should be strongly considered for women receiving these immunotherapies, and preventative strategies should be investigated in future studies.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationNeoplasmsAnimalsFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyMiceOocytesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36008687
OpenAlexW4293237865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.