Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36008678›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2023

Radiographic technique modification and evidence-based practice: A qualitative study.

Marnie Rawle, Alison Pighills, Diana Mendez, Karen Dobeli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Case for Implementation Science in Medical Radiation Practice.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marnie RawleMedical Imaging Department, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, 6 Doherty Street, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6620-1257
Alison PighillsDivision of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4172-2056
Diana MendezDivision of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7761-1043
Karen DobeliMedical Imaging Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Ned Hanlon Building, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6655-8566

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEvidence-based practice in radiography is an emerging practice, due to a lack of evidence. Beyond the diagnostic requirements of the examination, imaging technique decisions are guided by the radiographer's tertiary education and clinical experience. Imaging technique decisions should include all aspects of evidence-based practice: research-based evidence, patient circumstances and clinical experience. Previous research suggests radiographers do to not fully engage with the latter, which may jeopardise progress in the field and lead to outdated practices and suboptimal outcomes for patients. This study aimed to examine the motivators and influences involved in radiographers' decision-making when modifying imaging acquisition techniques.

methodsAn exploratory descriptive, inductive qualitative interview-based design was used with a convenience sample of radiographers from three public hospital sites in Queensland. Twelve one-on-one semi-structured interviews were performed via video conference, the data were analysed through thematic analysis.

resultsFive themes emerged from the data: advancement of technology; experience rather than evidence; radiology's influence on radiographic practice; information sources; and image quality. The pursuit of image quality was the key motivator and criterion that influenced radiographers' choices in imaging technique modification. Interviewees did not engage routinely with research-based evidence, preferring to rely on empirical observations and professional experience.

conclusionThe exclusion of research-based evidence can lead to outdated and ineffective clinical decisions. Further work is needed to promote more research in the field of radiography and increase the willingness and capacity of radiographers to follow the principles of evidence-based practice.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeHumansQualitative ResearchQueenslandRadiographyEvidence-basedevidence-based practiceimaging techniquequalitative researchradiography

Identifiers

PMID36008678
PMCPMC9977648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.