Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36008669›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Comparative Analysis of the Fitness of Candida albicans Strains During Colonization of the Mice Gastrointestinal Tract.

Daniel Prieto, Jesús Pla

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel PrietoDepartamento de Microbiología y Parasitología-IRYCIS, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús PlaDepartamento de Microbiología y Parasitología-IRYCIS, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. jpla@ucm.es.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida albicans populations present in the mammalian gastrointestinal tract are a major source of candidemia and subsequent severe invasive candidiasis in those individuals with acquired or congenital immune defects. Understanding the mechanisms used by this fungus to colonize this niche is, therefore, of primary importance to develop new therapeutic options that could lead to control its proliferation in the host. The recent popularization of models of commensalism in mice combined with the already powerful tools in C. albicans genetics allows to analyze the role of specific genes during colonization. Fitness can be analyzed for a specific C. albicans strain (test strain) by comparing its growth in vivo with an otherwise isogenic control strain via the analysis of the luminal content of the mouse gastrointestinal tract using flow cytometry, qPCR, or viable fungal cell counting. While all these procedures have limitations, they can be used to estimate the degree of adaptation of the test strain to the mammalian tract by determining its relative abundance with an internal control strain. By using specific genetically engineered C. albicans and mouse strains, antibiotic regimes, or even germ-free mice, this methodology allows to determine the role of the host immunological status, the bacterial microbiota, or individual fungal features (e.g., dimorphism) in the process of colonization of C. albicans of the mammalian gut.

Indexed as

CandidiasisMicrobiotaAnimalsCandida albicansGastrointestinal TractMammalsMiceSymbiosisAdaptationCandida albicansColonizationCommensalismCompetition assayFitnessGastrointestinal tract

Identifiers

PMID36008669
OpenAlexW4293056840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.