Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36008630›Full record

ArticleNature methods2022

Open microscopy in the life sciences: quo vadis?

Johannes Hohlbein, Benedict Diederich, Barbora Marsikova, Emmanuel G Reynaud, Séamus Holden, Wiebke Jahr, Robert Haase, Kirti Prakash

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. TWINKLE: An open-source two-photon microscope for teaching and research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Open, reproducible hardware for microscopy.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. EnderScope: a low-cost 3D printer-based scanning microscope for microplastic detection.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Johannes HohlbeinLaboratory of Biophysics, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. johannes.hohlbein@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7436-2221
Benedict DiederichLeibniz Institute for Photonic Technology, Jena, Germany.
Barbora MarsikovaLeibniz Institute for Photonic Technology, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8206-1549
Emmanuel G ReynaudSchool of Biomolecular and Biomedical Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1502-661X
Séamus HoldenSchool of Life Sciences, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Wiebke JahrIn-Vision Technologies AG, Guntramsdorf, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0201-2315
Robert HaaseDFG Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5949-2327
Kirti PrakashNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0325-9988

Funding

Wellcome Trust 206670/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Biological Science DisciplinesMicroscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.