Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36008541›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Survival prediction in triple negative breast cancer using multiple instance learning of histopathological images.

Piumi Sandarenu, Ewan K A Millar, Yang Song, Lois Browne, Julia Beretov, Jodi Lynch, Peter H Graham, Jitendra Jonnagaddala, Nicholas Hawkins, Junzhou Huang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Piumi SandarenuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Ewan K A MillarDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, NSW Health Pathology, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Yang SongSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Lois BrowneCancer Care Centre, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Julia BeretovDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, NSW Health Pathology, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Jodi LynchSt. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Peter H GrahamSt. George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Jitendra JonnagaddalaSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Nicholas HawkinsSchool of Medical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Junzhou HuangUniversity of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA.
Erik MeijeringSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia. erik.meijering@unsw.edu.au.
UNSW Sydney · AUSt George Hospital · AUSutherland Hospital · AUThe University of Texas at Arlington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational pathology is a rapidly expanding area for research due to the current global transformation of histopathology through the adoption of digital workflows. Survival prediction of breast cancer patients is an important task that currently depends on histopathology assessment of cancer morphological features, immunohistochemical biomarker expression and patient clinical findings. To facilitate the manual process of survival risk prediction, we developed a computational pathology framework for survival prediction using digitally scanned haematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue microarray images of clinically aggressive triple negative breast cancer. Our results show that the model can produce an average concordance index of 0.616. Our model predictions are analysed for independent prognostic significance in univariate analysis (hazard ratio = 3.12, 95% confidence interval [1.69,5.75], p < 0.005) and multivariate analysis using clinicopathological data (hazard ratio = 2.68, 95% confidence interval [1.44,4.99], p < 0.005). Through qualitative analysis of heatmaps generated from our model, an expert pathologist is able to associate tissue features highlighted in the attention heatmaps of high-risk predictions with morphological features associated with more aggressive behaviour such as low levels of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes, stroma rich tissues and high-grade invasive carcinoma, providing explainability of our method for triple negative breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinomaTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingPrognosisProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID36008541
PMCPMC9411153
OpenAlexW4293051558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.