Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36008533›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2022

Should variants of unknown significance (VUS) be disclosed to patients in cardiogenetics or not; only in case of high suspicion of pathogenicity?

Saskia N van der Crabben, Stellan Mörner, Anna C Lundström, Jenni Jonasson, Hennie Bikker, Ahmad S Amin, Annika Rydberg, Arthur A M Wilde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. What Should a Clinical Cardiologist Know About Cardiogenetics?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Genetic Spectrum of Lithuanian Familial Hypercholesterolemia Patients.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: is it a case for genetic testing?Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saskia N van der CrabbenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. s.n.vandercrabben@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8619-1511
Stellan MörnerEuropean Reference Network for rare, low-prevalence, or complex diseases of the heart (ERN GUARD-Heart), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anna C LundströmEuropean Reference Network for rare, low-prevalence, or complex diseases of the heart (ERN GUARD-Heart), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jenni JonassonEuropean Reference Network for rare, low-prevalence, or complex diseases of the heart (ERN GUARD-Heart), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Hennie BikkerDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ahmad S AminEuropean Reference Network for rare, low-prevalence, or complex diseases of the heart (ERN GUARD-Heart), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Annika RydbergEuropean Reference Network for rare, low-prevalence, or complex diseases of the heart (ERN GUARD-Heart), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Arthur A M WildeEuropean Reference Network for rare, low-prevalence, or complex diseases of the heart (ERN GUARD-Heart), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansVirulence

Identifiers

PMID36008533
PMCPMC9626604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.