Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36008473›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Cost function for low-dimensional manifold topology assessment.

Kamila Zdybał, Elizabeth Armstrong, James C Sutherland, Alessandro Parente

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kamila ZdybałUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, École polytechnique de Bruxelles, Aero-Thermo-Mechanics Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium. Kamila.Zdybal@ulb.ac.be.
Elizabeth ArmstrongDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
James C SutherlandDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. James.Sutherland@utah.edu.
Alessandro ParenteUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, École polytechnique de Bruxelles, Aero-Thermo-Mechanics Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium. Alessandro.Parente@ulb.be.

Funding

European Research Council 714605Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS Aspirant Research FellowNational Science Foundation 1953350Sandia National Laboratories DE-NA0003525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In reduced-order modeling, complex systems that exhibit high state-space dimensionality are described and evolved using a small number of parameters. These parameters can be obtained in a data-driven way, where a high-dimensional dataset is projected onto a lower-dimensional basis. A complex system is then restricted to states on a low-dimensional manifold where it can be efficiently modeled. While this approach brings computational benefits, obtaining a good quality of the manifold topology becomes a crucial aspect when models, such as nonlinear regression, are built on top of the manifold. Here, we present a quantitative metric for characterizing manifold topologies. Our metric pays attention to non-uniqueness and spatial gradients in physical quantities of interest, and can be applied to manifolds of arbitrary dimensionality. Using the metric as a cost function in optimization algorithms, we show that optimized low-dimensional projections can be found. We delineate a few applications of the cost function to datasets representing argon plasma, reacting flows and atmospheric pollutant dispersion. We demonstrate how the cost function can assess various dimensionality reduction and manifold learning techniques as well as data preprocessing strategies in their capacity to yield quality low-dimensional projections. We show that improved manifold topologies can facilitate building nonlinear regression models.

Identifiers

PMID36008473
PMCPMC9411209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.