Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36008412›Full record

ArticleNPJ genomic medicine2022

Methylation risk scores are associated with a collection of phenotypes within electronic health record systems.

Mike Thompson, Brian L Hill, Nadav Rakocz, Jeffrey N Chiang, Daniel Geschwind, Sriram Sankararaman, Ira Hofer, Maxime Cannesson, Noah Zaitlen, Eran Halperin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ genomic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Epigenetics of Childhood Obesity.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mike Thompson *Department of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. mjthompson@ucla.edu.
Brian L Hill *Department of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. brian.l.hill@cs.ucla.edu.
Nadav RakoczDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeffrey N ChiangDepartment of Computational Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6843-1355
Daniel GeschwindInstitute of Precision Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sriram SankararamanDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ira HoferDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Maxime CannessonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Noah ZaitlenDepartment of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eran HalperinDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. ehalperin@cs.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Identifying the genetic causes of depression in a deeply phenotyped population from South KoreaU01MH126798 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI AHN, YONG MIN, FLINT, JONATHAN · 2021 to 2025
$8.9M
Training Grant in Genomic Analysis and InterpretationT32HG002536 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Valerie A Arboleda, Harold Pimentel · 2002 to 2026
$8.6M
Leveraging genetic variation to dissect gene regulatory networks of reprogramming to pluripotencyU01HG012079 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Chongyuan Luo, Kathrin Plath · 2021 to 2026
$6.9M
Methods for Genome-wide Association Studies in Admixed PopulationsR01HG006399 · NHGRI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI PRICE, ALKES L · 2011 to 2024
$6.3M
Optimizing imputation for diverse populations in a distributed frameworkU01HG009080 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KENNY, EIMEAR ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2020
$5.2M
SINGLE-CELL MULTI-OMIC APPROACHES TO MECHANISTICALLY CHARACTERIZE PSYCHIATRIC DISORDER RISK LOCI IN THE HUMAN BRAINR01MH125252 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LUO, CHONGYUAN · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
Improved methods for inference of genotype-specific response to environmental toxinsR01ES029929 · NIEHS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI AYROLES, JULIEN, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
Machine Learning of Physiological Waveforms and Electronic Health Record Data to Predict, Diagnose, and Treat Hemodynamic Instability in Surgical PatientsR01HL144692 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNESSON, MAXIME · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Genomic Approaches to Population Health in Multi-Ethnic Hospital SystemsR01HG011345 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ARBOLEDA, VALERIE A, GIGNOUX, CHRISTOPHER R · 2020 to 2023
$3.1M
Epigenomics of asthma risk factors and clinical subtypes in minority childrenR01HL155024 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BORRELL, LUISA N, ZAITLEN, NOAH A · 2021 to 2024
$2.9M
Methods for Genomic Analysis in Heterogeneous TissuesR01HG010505 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HALPERIN, ERAN · 2019 to 2022
$2.6M
Biomedical Informatics Tools for Applied Perioperative PhysiologyR01EB029751 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNESSON, MAXIME · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
CSRD VA I01 CX002011NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006399NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010505NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011345NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002536NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009080NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG012079NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144692NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155024NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029751NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES029929NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM142112NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125252NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH126798NSF | Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering | Division of Information and Intelligent Systems (Information & Intelligent Systems) 1705197U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) R01HG010505-02U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) R01HG011345U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) T32HG002536U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) U01HG009080U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) U01HG012079U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) R01ES029929U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) R01HL155024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inference of clinical phenotypes is a fundamental task in precision medicine, and has therefore been heavily investigated in recent years in the context of electronic health records (EHR) using a large arsenal of machine learning techniques, as well as in the context of genetics using polygenic risk scores (PRS). In this work, we considered the epigenetic analog of PRS, methylation risk scores (MRS), a linear combination of methylation states. We measured methylation across a large cohort (n = 831) of diverse samples in the UCLA Health biobank, for which both genetic and complete EHR data are available. We constructed MRS for 607 phenotypes spanning diagnoses, clinical lab tests, and medication prescriptions. When added to a baseline set of predictive features, MRS significantly improved the imputation of 139 outcomes, whereas the PRS improved only 22 (median improvement for methylation 10.74%, 141.52%, and 15.46% in medications, labs, and diagnosis codes, respectively, whereas genotypes only improved the labs at a median increase of 18.42%). We added significant MRS to state-of-the-art EHR imputation methods that leverage the entire set of medical records, and found that including MRS as a medical feature in the algorithm significantly improves EHR imputation in 37% of lab tests examined (median R

Identifiers

PMID36008412
PMCPMC9411568
OpenAlexW4293052083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.