Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36008231›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Stamping the vaccine passport? Public support for lifting COVID-19 related restrictions for vaccinated citizens in France, Germany, and Sweden.

Florian Stoeckel, Sabrina Stöckli, Joseph Phillips, Benjamin Lyons, Vittorio Mérola, Matthew Barnfield, Paula Szewach, Jack Thompson, Jason Reifler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Florian StoeckelDept of Politics, University of Exeter, United Kingdom. Electronic address: f.stoeckel@exeter.ac.uk.
Sabrina StöckliDept of Consumer Behavior, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Joseph PhillipsSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, United Kingdom.
Benjamin LyonsDept of Communication, University of Utah, United States.
Vittorio MérolaSchool of Government and International Affairs, Durham University, United Kingdom.
Matthew BarnfieldDept of Politics, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
Paula SzewachDept of Politics, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
Jack ThompsonDept of Politics, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
Jason ReiflerDept of Politics, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.

Funding

European Research Council 682758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During theCOVID-19pandemic,manycountries implementedrestrictionsto limit the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (e.g. travel restrictions and lockdowns).One path to loosening restrictions is to do so selectively only for vaccinated individuals (e.g. by implementing vaccine passports domestically or as a prerequisite for international travel).Setting different rules based on people's vaccination statusis howevera contentious issue among health policy experts, government officials, and the public. Our analysis focuses on the levels and correlates of public support for the lifting of restrictions for the vaccinatedin April 2021, i.e. at a time when restrictions were in place and aselective lifting of these restrictions just for the vaccinatedwas debated in Europe.We use representative quota samples of the populations of France (N = 1,752), Germany (N = 1,759), and Sweden (N = 1,754). We find that a slight plurality support lifting restrictions for the vaccinated in France and Germany but not in Sweden. Vaccine hesitancy emerges as strong predictor of opposition to such a policy. Additionally, individuals who are already vaccinated (in France and Germany) and who are higher in risk-seeking express more support for the lifting of restrictions for the vaccinated. We discuss implications for the debate on vaccine passports.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCommunicable Disease ControlFranceGermanyHumansSARS-CoV-2SwedenVaccinationVaccinesCovid-19Lifting restrictionsPublic healthPublic opinionVaccinationVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36008231
PMCPMC9385771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.