ArticleAmerican journal of surgery2022
Comparing outcomes of cholecystectomies in white vs. minority patients.
Article in American journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- United States benign gallbladder disease mortality, 1999-2024: rising cholecystitis and persistent demographic and geographic disparities.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Robotic cholecystectomy is safe and effective for all levels of gallbladder pathology in both the elective and emergent setting in a patient population with a high comorbidity load: outcomes from East Flatbush, New York.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Racial and ethnic disparities in gallbladder cancer: A two-decade analysis of incidence and mortality rates in the US.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the disparity between white and minority patients undergoing cholecystectomies, including presentation, outcomes, and financial burden.
methodsThis was an IRB approved retrospective review of all cholecystectomies at an academic medical center from 2013 to 2018. Data collected include demographics, insurance type, charge of admission, and clinical outcomes.
results1539 patients underwent cholecystectomies. Of those, 36.9% were white and 63.1% were minority. Minority patients presented at a younger age than white patients (45.5 vs 53.9, p < 0.01) and required emergent admission (76.2% vs 68.4%, p < 0.01). No significant difference was found for clinical outcomes between white and minority. Minority patients were more commonly uninsured (32.1%). Among the uninsured, self-pay had a higher charge than emergency MediCal (by 5.46 per 1000 dollars).
conclusionMinority patients are more commonly disadvantaged at presentation and charged more due to insurance status despite similar outcomes after cholecystectomies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.