Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36008111›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition2024

Neonatal BCG: a time for change.

Thillagavathie Pillay, Gergely Toldi, Abid Hussain, Mercy Murinye Magwenzi, Prakash Satodia, Ruth Radcliffe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Thillagavathie PillayNeonatology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK tilly.pillay@uhl-tr.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4159-3282
Gergely ToldiStarship Children's Health Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, The University of Auckland Liggins Institute, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abid HussainDepartment of Microbiology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Mercy Murinye MagwenziBirmingham Community Healthcare Trust, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
Prakash SatodiaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Ruth RadcliffeDepartment of Paediatrics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Wolverhampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The BCG vaccination programme in the UK is risk based and has usually been given to eligible babies soon after birth. On advice from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, NHS England and Improvement recently revised the timing of this vaccination to 28 days after birth or soon thereafter. In this article, we highlight the change in timing of vaccination, the rationale and barriers to BCG uptake that this change may pose.

Indexed as

TuberculosisBCG VaccineEnglandHumansImmunization ProgramsInfantInfant, NewbornVaccinationBCG Vaccineallergy and immunologycommunicable diseasesinfectious disease medicineneonatologypaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID36008111
PMCPMC10850640
OpenAlexW4293240475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.