Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36007955›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2022

Mechanical and Geometric Analysis of Fenestration Design for Polymethylmethacrylate-Augmented Pedicle Screw Fixation.

Melissa Kwak, Andreas Fahlström, Danè Dabirrahmani, Richard Appleyard, Joseph Cadman, Michael Selby, Rob Kuru, Gordon Dandie, Andrew Kam

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A novel UHMWPE anchor for improving the pullout resistance of pedicle screws.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa KwakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Norwest Private Hospital, Bella Vista, Australia.
Andreas FahlströmDepartment of Neurosurgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia Fahlstrom.Andreas@gmail.com.
Danè DabirrahmaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia.
Richard AppleyardDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia.
Joseph CadmanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia.
Michael SelbyAdelaide Spine and Brain, North Adelaide, Australia.
Rob KuruLake Macquarie Private Hospital, Gateshead, Australia.
Gordon DandieHead of Department of Neurosurgery, Westmead Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Andrew KamWestmead Hospital, Brain and Spine Centre Sydney, Westmead, Australia.
Macquarie University · AUWestmead Hospital · AULake Macquarie Private Hospital · AUThe University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe practice of cement augmentation in pedicle screw fixation is well established. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal screw design or cement type. This remains a clinically important question given the incidence of cement augmentation-associated complications. While fenestrated screws have become widely used in clinical practice, the relationship between fenestration placement along the screw axis and cement plume geometry and pullout strength have yet to be clarified. This study was designed to evaluate the mechanical and geometric properties of different fenestrated screw designs and cement viscosities in pedicle screw fixation.

methodsThree different screw fenestration configurations and 2 different cement viscosities were examined in this study. Axial pullout tests were conducted in both foam blocks and cadaveric vertebrae. All vertebral specimens underwent tests of bone mineral density. In the foam blocks, 6 tests were conducted for each augmentation combination and also for nonaugmented controls. In the cadaveric testing, 36 lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with a cemented and uncemented control screw to compare features of fixation. Computed tomography (CT) images were taken to assess the geometric profile of the cement plumes in both the foam blocks and the cadaveric vertebrae.

resultsIn both foam blocks and vertebral specimens, cementation was shown to confer a significant increase in pullout strength. Significant correlations existed between the anterior-posterior and lateral cement plume diameters and pullout strength in cadaveric vertebra and foam blocks, respectively. Within instrumented vertebra, variables such as the width of the vertebral body and screw insertion were found to significantly correlate with enhanced fixation. CT analysis of the instrumented vertebra demonstrated that a centrally distributed pattern of fenestrations was found to result in a cement plume with consistently predictable distribution within the vertebral body, without evidence of leak.

conclusionCementation of fenestrated pedicle screws increases overall pullout forces; however, there is an unclear relationship between the geometric properties of the cement plume and the overall strength of the screw-bone interface. This study demonstrates that the plume diameter, vertebral body width, and angle of screw insertion are correlated with enhanced pullout strength. Furthermore, varying the fenestration design of injectable screws resulted in a set of predictable plume patterns, which may be associated with fewer complications. Further investigation is required to clarify the optimal geometric and biomechanical properties of injectable pedicle screws and their role in establishing the cement-bone interface. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study is relevant to currently practicing spinal surgeons and biomechanical engineers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5:

Indexed as

axial pulloutcement leakpedicle screw fixationvertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36007955
PMCPMC10151389
OpenAlexW4293236065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.